diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt | 4819 |
1 files changed, 4819 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a0a55af --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1060.txt @@ -0,0 +1,4819 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group J. Reynolds +Request for Comments: 1060 J. Postel +Obsoletes RFCs: 1010, 990, 960, 943, 923, 900, 870, ISI +820, 790, 776, 770, 762, 758,755, 750, 739, 604, March 1990 +503, 433, 349 +Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 + + ASSIGNED NUMBERS + +STATUS OF THIS MEMO + + This memo is a status report on the parameters (i.e., numbers and + keywords) used in protocols in the Internet community. Distribution + of this memo is unlimited. + + Table of Contents + +INTRODUCTION.................................................... 2 +Data Notations.................................................. 3 +Special Addresses............................................... 4 +VERSION NUMBERS................................................. 6 +PROTOCOL NUMBERS................................................ 7 +PORT NUMBERS.................................................... 9 +UNIX PORTS......................................................13 +INTERNET MULTICAST ADDRESSES....................................19 +IANA ETHERNET ADDRESS BLOCK.....................................20 +IP TOS PARAMETERS...............................................21 +IP TIME TO LIVE PARAMETER.......................................23 +DOMAIN SYSTEM PARAMETERS........................................24 +BOOTP PARAMETERS................................................25 +NETWORK MANAGEMENT PARAMETERS...................................26 +ARPANET AND MILNET LOGICAL ADDRESSES............................30 +ARPANET AND MILNET LINK NUMBERS.................................31 +ARPANET AND MILNET X. 25 ADDRESS MAPPINGS.......................32 +IEEE 802 NUMBERS OF INTEREST....................................34 +ETHERNET NUMBERS OF INTEREST....................................35 +ETHERNET VENDOR ADDRESS COMPONENTS..............................38 +ETHERNET MULTICAST ADDRESSES....................................41 +XNS PROTOCOL TYPES..............................................43 +PROTOCOL/TYPE FIELD ASSIGNMENTS.................................44 +PRONET 80 TYPE NUMBERS..........................................45 +ADDRESS RESOLUTION PROTOCOL PARAMETERS..........................46 +REVERSE ADDRESS RESOLUTION PROTOCOL OPERATION CODES.............47 +DYNAMIC REVERSE ARP.............................................47 +X.25 TYPE NUMBERS...............................................48 +PUBLIC DATA NETWORK NUMBERS.....................................49 +TELNET OPTIONS..................................................51 +MAIL ENCRYPTION TYPES...........................................52 + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 1] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + +MACHINE NAMES...................................................53 +SYSTEM NAMES....................................................57 +PROTOCOL AND SERVICE NAMES......................................58 +TERMINAL TYPE NAMES.............................................62 +DOCUMENTS.......................................................65 +PEOPLE..........................................................76 +Security Considerations.........................................86 +Authors' Addresses..............................................86 + +INTRODUCTION + + This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the + currently assigned values from several series of numbers used in + network protocol implementations. This RFC will be updated + periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from + the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). If you are developing + a protocol or application that will require the use of a link, socket, + port, protocol, etc., please contact the IANA to receive a number + assignment. + + Joyce K. Reynolds + Internet Assigned Numbers Authority + USC - Information Sciences Institute + 4676 Admiralty Way + Marina del Rey, California 90292-6695 + + Phone: (213) 822-1511 + + Electronic mail: JKREY@ISI.EDU + + Most of the protocols mentioned here are documented in the RFC series + of notes. Some of the items listed are undocumented. Further + information on protocols can be found in the memo "Official Internet + Protocols" [118]. The more prominent and more generally used are + documented in the "DDN Protocol Handbook, Volume Two, DARPA Internet + Protocols" [45] prepared by the NIC. Other collections of older or + obsolete protocols are contained in the "Internet Protocol Transition + Workbook" [76], or in the "ARPANET Protocol Transition Handbook" + [47]. For further information on ordering the complete 1985 DDN + Protocol Handbook, write: SRI International (SRI-NIC), DDN Network + Information Center, Room EJ291, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, + CA., 94025; or call: 1-800-235-3155. Also, the Internet Activities + Board (IAB) publishes the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" [62], + which describes the state of standardization of protocols used in the + Internet. This document is issued quarterly. Current copies may be + obtained from the DDN Network Information Center or from the IANA. + + In the entries below, the name and mailbox of the responsible + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 2] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + individual is indicated. The bracketed entry, e.g., [nn,iii], at the + right hand margin of the page indicates a reference for the listed + protocol, where the number ("nn") cites the document and the letters + ("iii") cites the person. Whenever possible, the letters are a NIC + Ident as used in the WhoIs (NICNAME) service. + +Data Notations + + The convention in the documentation of Internet Protocols is to + express numbers in decimal and to picture data in "big-endian" order + [21]. That is, fields are described left to right, with the most + significant octet on the left and the least significant octet on the + right. + + The order of transmission of the header and data described in this + document is resolved to the octet level. Whenever a diagram shows a + group of octets, the order of transmission of those octets is the + normal order in which they are read in English. For example, in the + following diagram the octets are transmitted in the order they are + numbered. + + + 0 1 2 3 + 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + + Transmission Order of Bytes + + Whenever an octet represents a numeric quantity the left most bit in + the diagram is the high order or most significant bit. That is, the + bit labeled 0 is the most significant bit. For example, the + following diagram represents the value 170 (decimal). + + + 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + |1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0| + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + + Significance of Bits + + Similarly, whenever a multi-octet field represents a numeric quantity + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 3] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + the left most bit of the whole field is the most significant bit. + When a multi-octet quantity is transmitted the most significant octet + is transmitted first. + +Special Addresses: + + There are five classes of IP addresses: Class A through Class E + [119]. Of these, Class D and Class E addresses are reserved for + experimental use. A gateway which is not participating in these + experiments must ignore all datagrams with a Class D or Class E + destination IP address. ICMP Destination Unreachable or ICMP + Redirect messages must not result from receiving such datagrams. + + There are certain special cases for IP addresses [11]. These special + cases can be concisely summarized using the earlier notation for an + IP address: + + IP-address ::= { <Network-number>, <Host-number> } + + or + + IP-address ::= { <Network-number>, <Subnet-number>, + <Host-number> } + + if we also use the notation "-1" to mean the field contains all 1 + bits. Some common special cases are as follows: + + (a) {0, 0} + + This host on this network. Can only be used as a source + address (see note later). + + (b) {0, <Host-number>} + + Specified host on this network. Can only be used as a + source address. + + (c) { -1, -1} + + Limited broadcast. Can only be used as a destination + address, and a datagram with this address must never be + forwarded outside the (sub-)net of the source. + + (d) {<Network-number>, -1} + + Directed broadcast to specified network. Can only be used + as a destination address. + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 4] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + (e) {<Network-number>, <Subnet-number>, -1} + + Directed broadcast to specified subnet. Can only be used as + a destination address. + + (f) {<Network-number>, -1, -1} + + Directed broadcast to all subnets of specified subnetted + network. Can only be used as a destination address. + + (g) {127, <any>} + + Internal host loopback address. Should never appear outside + a host. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 5] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + VERSION NUMBERS + + In the Internet Protocol (IP) [45,105] there is a field to identify + the version of the internetwork general protocol. This field is 4 + bits in size. + + Assigned Internet Version Numbers + + Decimal Keyword Version References + ------- ------- ------- ---------- + 0 Reserved [JBP] + 1-3 Unassigned [JBP] + 4 IP Internet Protocol [105,JBP] + 5 ST ST Datagram Mode [49,JWF] + 6-14 Unassigned [JBP] + 15 Reserved [JBP] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 6] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + PROTOCOL NUMBERS + + In the Internet Protocol (IP) [45,105] there is a field, called + Protocol, to identify the the next level protocol. This is an 8 bit + field. + + Assigned Internet Protocol Numbers + + Decimal Keyword Protocol References + ------- ------- -------- ---------- + 0 Reserved [JBP] + 1 ICMP Internet Control Message [97,JBP] + 2 IGMP Internet Group Management [43,JBP] + 3 GGP Gateway-to-Gateway [60,MB] + 4 Unassigned [JBP] + 5 ST Stream [49,JWF] + 6 TCP Transmission Control [106,JBP] + 7 UCL UCL [PK] + 8 EGP Exterior Gateway Protocol [123,DLM1] + 9 IGP any private interior gateway [JBP] + 10 BBN-RCC-MON BBN RCC Monitoring [SGC] + 11 NVP-II Network Voice Protocol [22,SC3] + 12 PUP PUP [8,XEROX] + 13 ARGUS ARGUS [RWS4] + 14 EMCON EMCON [BN7] + 15 XNET Cross Net Debugger [56,JFH2] + 16 CHAOS Chaos [NC3] + 17 UDP User Datagram [104,JBP] + 18 MUX Multiplexing [23,JBP] + 19 DCN-MEAS DCN Measurement Subsystems [DLM1] + 20 HMP Host Monitoring [59,RH6] + 21 PRM Packet Radio Measurement [ZSU] + 22 XNS-IDP XEROX NS IDP [133,XEROX] + 23 TRUNK-1 Trunk-1 [BWB6] + 24 TRUNK-2 Trunk-2 [BWB6] + 25 LEAF-1 Leaf-1 [BWB6] + 26 LEAF-2 Leaf-2 [BWB6] + 27 RDP Reliable Data Protocol [138,RH6] + 28 IRTP Internet Reliable Transaction [79,TXM] + 29 ISO-TP4 ISO Transport Protocol Class 4 [63,RC77] + 30 NETBLT Bulk Data Transfer Protocol [20,DDC1] + 31 MFE-NSP MFE Network Services Protocol [124,BCH2] + 32 MERIT-INP MERIT Internodal Protocol [HWB] + 33 SEP Sequential Exchange Protocol [JC120] + 34 3PC Third Party Connect Protocol [SAF3] + 35-60 Unassigned [JBP] + 61 any host internal protocol [JBP] + 62 CFTP CFTP [50,HCF2] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 7] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 63 any local network [JBP] + 64 SAT-EXPAK SATNET and Backroom EXPAK [SHB] + 65 Unassigned [JBP] + 66 RVD MIT Remote Virtual Disk Protocol [MBG] + 67 IPPC Internet Pluribus Packet Core [SHB] + 68 any distributed file system [JBP] + 69 SAT-MON SATNET Monitoring [SHB] + 70 VISA VISA Protocol [GXT1] + 71 IPCV Internet Packet Core Utility [SHB] + 72-75 Unassigned [JBP] + 76 BR-SAT-MON Backroom SATNET Monitoring [SHB] + 77 SUN-ND SUN ND PROTOCOL-Temporary [WM3] + 78 WB-MON WIDEBAND Monitoring [SHB] + 79 WB-EXPAK WIDEBAND EXPAK [SHB] + 80 ISO-IP ISO Internet Protocol [MTR] + 81 VMTP VMTP [DRC3] + 82 SECURE-VMTP SECURE-VMTP [DRC3] + 83 VINES VINES [BXH] + 84 TTP TTP [JXS] + 85 NSFNET-IGP NSFNET-IGP [HWB] + 86 DGP Dissimilar Gateway Protocol [74,ML109] + 87 TCF TCF [GAL5] + 88 IGRP IGRP [18,GXS] + 89 OSPFIGP OSPFIGP [83,JTM4] + 90 Sprite-RPC Sprite RPC Protocol [143,BXW] + 91 LARP Locus Address Resolution Protocol [BXH] + 92-254 Unassigned [JBP] + 255 Reserved [JBP] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 8] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + PORT NUMBERS + +Ports are used in the TCP [45,106] to name the ends of logical +connections which carry long term conversations. For the purpose of +providing services to unknown callers, a service contact port is +defined. This list specifies the port used by the server process as its +contact port. The contact port is sometimes called the "well-known +port". + +To the extent possible, these same port assignments are used with the +UDP [46,104]. + +To the extent possible, these same port assignments are used with the +ISO-TP4 [64]. + +The assigned ports use a small portion of the possible port numbers. +The assigned ports have all except the low order eight bits cleared to +zero. The low order eight bits are specified here. + + Port Assignments: + + Decimal Keyword Description References + ------- ------- ----------- ---------- + 0 Reserved [JBP] + 1 TCPMUX TCP Port Service Multiplexer [MKL] + 2-4 Unassigned [JBP] + 5 RJE Remote Job Entry [12,JBP] + 7 ECHO Echo [95,JBP] + 9 DISCARD Discard [94,JBP] + 11 USERS Active Users [89,JBP] + 13 DAYTIME Daytime [93,JBP] + 15 Unassigned [JBP] + 17 QUOTE Quote of the Day [100,JBP] + 19 CHARGEN Character Generator [92,JBP] + 20 FTP-DATA File Transfer [Default Data] [96,JBP] + 21 FTP File Transfer [Control] [96,JBP] + 23 TELNET Telnet [112,JBP] + 25 SMTP Simple Mail Transfer [102,JBP] + 27 NSW-FE NSW User System FE [24,RHT] + 29 MSG-ICP MSG ICP [85,RHT] + 31 MSG-AUTH MSG Authentication [85,RHT] + 33 DSP Display Support Protocol [EXC] + 35 any private printer server [JBP] + 37 TIME Time [108,JBP] + 39 RLP Resource Location Protocol [MA] + 41 GRAPHICS Graphics [129,JBP] + 42 NAMESERVER Host Name Server [99,JBP] + 43 NICNAME Who Is [55,MARY] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 9] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 44 MPM-FLAGS MPM FLAGS Protocol [JBP] + 45 MPM Message Processing Module [recv] [98,JBP] + 46 MPM-SND MPM [default send] [98,JBP] + 47 NI-FTP NI FTP [134,SK8] + 49 LOGIN Login Host Protocol [PHD1] + 51 LA-MAINT IMP Logical Address Maintenance [76,AGM] + 53 DOMAIN Domain Name Server [81,95,PM1] + 55 ISI-GL ISI Graphics Language [7,RB9] + 57 any private terminal access [JBP] + 59 any private file service [JBP] + 61 NI-MAIL NI MAIL [5,SK8] + 63 VIA-FTP VIA Systems - FTP [DXD] + 65 TACACS-DS TACACS-Database Service [3,KH43] + 67 BOOTPS Bootstrap Protocol Server [36,WJC2] + 68 BOOTPC Bootstrap Protocol Client [36,WJC2] + 69 TFTP Trivial File Transfer [126,DDC1] + 71 NETRJS-1 Remote Job Service [10,RTB3] + 72 NETRJS-2 Remote Job Service [10,RTB3] + 73 NETRJS-3 Remote Job Service [10,RTB3] + 74 NETRJS-4 Remote Job Service [10,RTB3] + 75 any private dial out service [JBP] + 77 any private RJE service [JBP] + 79 FINGER Finger [52,KLH] + 81 HOSTS2-NS HOSTS2 Name Server [EAK1] + 83 MIT-ML-DEV MIT ML Device [DPR] + 85 MIT-ML-DEV MIT ML Device [DPR] + 87 any private terminal link [JBP] + 89 SU-MIT-TG SU/MIT Telnet Gateway [MRC] + 91 MIT-DOV MIT Dover Spooler [EBM] + 93 DCP Device Control Protocol [DT15] + 95 SUPDUP SUPDUP [27,MRC] + 97 SWIFT-RVF Swift Remote Vitural File Protocol [MXR] + 98 TACNEWS TAC News [ANM2] + 99 METAGRAM Metagram Relay [GEOF] + 101 HOSTNAME NIC Host Name Server [54,MARY] + 102 ISO-TSAP ISO-TSAP [16,MTR] + 103 X400 X400 [HCF2] + 104 X400-SND X400-SND [HCF2] + 105 CSNET-NS Mailbox Name Nameserver [127,MS56] + 107 RTELNET Remote Telnet Service [101,JBP] + 109 POP2 Post Office Protocol - Version 2 [14,JKR1] + 110 POP3 Post Office Protocol - Version 3 [122,MTR] + 111 SUNRPC SUN Remote Procedure Call [DXG] + 113 AUTH Authentication Service [130,MCSJ] + 115 SFTP Simple File Transfer Protocol [73,MKL1] + 117 UUCP-PATH UUCP Path Service [44,MAE] + 119 NNTP Network News Transfer Protocol [65,PL4] + 121 ERPC Encore Expedited Remote Proc. Call [132,JXO] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 10] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 123 NTP Network Time Protocol [80,DLM1] + 125 LOCUS-MAP Locus PC-Interface Net Map Server [137,EP53] + 127 LOCUS-CON Locus PC-Interface Conn Server [137,EP53] + 129 PWDGEN Password Generator Protocol [141,FJW] + 130 CISCO-FNA CISCO FNATIVE [WXB] + 131 CISCO-TNA CISCO TNATIVE [WXB] + 132 CISCO-SYS CISCO SYSMAINT [WXB] + 133 STATSRV Statistics Service [DLM1] + 134 INGRES-NET INGRES-NET Service [MXB] + 135 LOC-SRV Location Service [JXP] + 136 PROFILE PROFILE Naming System [LLP] + 137 NETBIOS-NS NETBIOS Name Service [JBP] + 138 NETBIOS-DGM NETBIOS Datagram Service [JBP] + 139 NETBIOS-SSN NETBIOS Session Service [JBP] + 140 EMFIS-DATA EMFIS Data Service [GB7] + 141 EMFIS-CNTL EMFIS Control Service [GB7] + 142 BL-IDM Britton-Lee IDM [SXS1] + 143 IMAP2 Interim Mail Access Protocol v2 [MRC] + 144 NEWS NewS [JAG] + 145 UAAC UAAC Protocol [DAG4] + 146 ISO-TP0 ISO-IP0 [86,MTR] + 147 ISO-IP ISO-IP [MTR] + 148 CRONUS CRONUS-SUPPORT [135,JXB] + 149 AED-512 AED 512 Emulation Service [AXB] + 150 SQL-NET SQL-NET [MXP] + 151 HEMS HEMS [87,CXT] + 152 BFTP Background File Transfer Program [AD14] + 153 SGMP SGMP [37,MS9] + 154 NETSC-PROD NETSC [SH37] + 155 NETSC-DEV NETSC [SH37] + 156 SQLSRV SQL Service [CMR] + 157 KNET-CMP KNET/VM Command/Message Protocol [77,GSM11] + 158 PCMail-SRV PCMail Server [19,MXL] + 159 NSS-Routing NSS-Routing [JXR] + 160 SGMP-TRAPS SGMP-TRAPS [37,MS9] + 161 SNMP SNMP [15,MTR] + 162 SNMPTRAP SNMPTRAP [15,MTR] + 163 CMIP-Manage CMIP/TCP Manager [4,AXB1] + 164 CMIP-Agent CMIP/TCP Agent [4,AXB1] + 165 XNS-Courier Xerox [144,SXA] + 166 S-Net Sirius Systems [BXL] + 167 NAMP NAMP [MS9] + 168 RSVD RSVD [NT12] + 169 SEND SEND [WDW11] + 170 Print-SRV Network PostScript [BKR] + 171 Multiplex Network Innovations Multiplex [KXD] + 172 CL/1 Network Innovations CL/1 [KXD] + 173 Xyplex-MUX Xyplex [BXS] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 11] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 174 MAILQ MAILQ [RXZ] + 175 VMNET VMNET [CXT] + 176 GENRAD-MUX GENRAD-MUX [RXT] + 177 XDMCP X Display Manager Control Protocol [RWS4] + 178 NextStep NextStep Window Server [LXH] + 179 BGP Border Gateway Protocol [KSL] + 180 RIS Intergraph [DXB] + 181 Unify Unify [VXS] + 182 Unisys-Cam Unisys-Cam [GXG] + 183 OCBinder OCBinder [JXO1] + 184 OCServer OCServer [JXO1] + 185 Remote-KIS Remote-KIS [RXD1] + 186 KIS KIS Protocol [RXD1] + 187 ACI Application Communication Interface [RXC1] + 188 MUMPS MUMPS [HS23] + 189 QFT Queued File Transport [WXS] + 190 GACP Gateway Access Control Protocol [PCW] + 191 Prospero Prospero [BCN] + 192 OSU-NMS OSU Network Monitoring System [DXK] + 193 SRMP Spider Remote Monitoring Protocol [TXS] + 194 IRC Internet Relay Chat Protocol [JXO2] + 195 DN6-NLM-AUD DNSIX Network Level Module Audit [LL69] + 196 DN6-SMM-RED DNSIX Session Mgt Module Audit Redirect[LL69] + 197 DLS Directory Location Service [SXB] + 198 DLS-Mon Directory Location Service Monitor [SXB] + 198-200 Unassigned [JBP] + 201 AT-RMTP AppleTalk Routing Maintenance [RXC] + 202 AT-NBP AppleTalk Name Binding [RXC] + 203 AT-3 AppleTalk Unused [RXC] + 204 AT-ECHO AppleTalk Echo [RXC] + 205 AT-5 AppleTalk Unused [RXC] + 206 AT-ZIS AppleTalk Zone Information [RXC] + 207 AT-7 AppleTalk Unused [RXC] + 208 AT-8 AppleTalk Unused [RXC] + 209-223 Unassigned [JBP] + 224-241 Reserved [JBP] + 243 SUR-MEAS Survey Measurement [6,DDC1] + 245 LINK LINK [1,RDB2] + 246 DSP3270 Display Systems Protocol [39,WJS1] + 247-255 Reserved [JBP] + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 12] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + UNIX PORTS + + By convention, ports in the range 256 to 1024 are used for "Unix + Standard" services. Listed here are some of the normal uses of these + port numbers. + + Service Name Port/Protocol Description + ------------ ------------- ----------- + + echo 7/tcp + discard 9/tcp sink null + systat 11/tcp users + daytime 13/tcp + netstat 15/tcp + qotd 17/tcp quote + chargen 19/tcp ttytst source + ftp-data 20/tcp + ftp 21/tcp + telnet 23/tcp + smtp 25/tcp mail + time 37/tcp timserver + name 42/tcp nameserver + whois 43/tcp nicname + nameserver 53/tcp domain + apts 57/tcp any private terminal service + apfs 59/tcp any private file service + rje 77/tcp netrjs + finger 79/tcp + link 87/tcp ttylink + supdup 95/tcp + newacct 100/tcp [unauthorized use] + hostnames 101/tcp hostname + iso-tsap 102/tcp tsap + x400 103/tcp + x400-snd 104/tcp + csnet-ns 105/tcp CSNET Name Service + pop-2 109/tcp pop postoffice + sunrpc 111/tcp + auth 113/tcp authentication + sftp 115/tcp + uucp-path 117/tcp + nntp 119/tcp usenet readnews untp + ntp 123/tcp network time protocol + statsrv 133/tcp + profile 136/tcp + NeWS 144/tcp news + print-srv 170/tcp + exec 512/tcp remote process execution; + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 13] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + authentication performed using + passwords and UNIX loppgin names + login 513/tcp remote login a la telnet; + automatic authentication performed + based on priviledged port numbers + and distributed data bases which + identify "authentication domains" + cmd 514/tcp like exec, but automatic + authentication is performed as for + login server + printer 515/tcp spooler + efs 520/tcp extended file name server + tempo 526/tcp newdate + courier 530/tcp rpc + conference 531/tcp chat + netnews 532/tcp readnews + uucp 540/tcp uucpd + klogin 543/tcp + kshell 544/tcp krcmd + dsf 555/tcp + remotefs 556/tcp rfs server + chshell 562/tcp chcmd + meter 570/tcp demon + pcserver 600/tcp Sun IPC server + nqs 607/tcp nqs + mdqs 666/tcp + rfile 750/tcp + pump 751/tcp + qrh 752/tcp + rrh 753/tcp + tell 754/tcp send + nlogin 758/tcp + con 759/tcp + ns 760/tcp + rxe 761/tcp + quotad 762/tcp + cycleserv 763/tcp + omserv 764/tcp + webster 765/tcp + phonebook 767/tcp phone + vid 769/tcp + rtip 771/tcp + cycleserv2 772/tcp + submit 773/tcp + rpasswd 774/tcp + entomb 775/tcp + wpages 776/tcp + wpgs 780/tcp + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 14] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + mdbs_daemon 800/tcp + device 801/tcp + maitrd 997/tcp + busboy 998/tcp + garcon 999/tcp + blackjack 1025/tcp network blackjack + bbn-mmc 1347/tcp multi media conferencing + bbn-mmx 1348/tcp multi media conferencing + orasrv 1525/tcp oracle + ingreslock 1524/tcp + issd 1600/tcp + nkd 1650/tcp + dc 2001/tcp + mailbox 2004/tcp + berknet 2005/tcp + invokator 2006/tcp + dectalk 2007/tcp + conf 2008/tcp + news 2009/tcp + search 2010/tcp + raid-cc 2011/tcp raid + ttyinfo 2012/tcp + raid-am 2013/tcp + troff 2014/tcp + cypress 2015/tcp + cypress-stat 2017/tcp + terminaldb 2018/tcp + whosockami 2019/tcp + servexec 2021/tcp + down 2022/tcp + ellpack 2025/tcp + shadowserver 2027/tcp + submitserver 2028/tcp + device2 2030/tcp + blackboard 2032/tcp + glogger 2033/tcp + scoremgr 2034/tcp + imsldoc 2035/tcp + objectmanager 2038/tcp + lam 2040/tcp + interbase 2041/tcp + isis 2042/tcp + rimsl 2044/tcp + dls 2047/tcp + dls-monitor 2048/tcp + shilp 2049/tcp + NSWS 3049/tcp + rfa 4672/tcp remote file access server + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 15] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + commplex-main 5000/tcp + commplex-link 5001/tcp + padl2sim 5236/tcp + man 9535/tcp + + echo 7/udp + discard 9/udp sink null + systat 11/udp users + daytime 13/udp + netstat 15/udp + qotd 17/udp quote + chargen 19/udp ttytst source + time 37/udp timserver + rlp 39/udp resource + name 42/udp nameserver + whois 43/udp nicname + nameserver 53/udp domain + bootps 67/udp bootp + bootpc 68/udp + tftp 69/udp + sunrpc 111/udp + erpc 121/udp + ntp 123/udp + statsrv 133/udp + profile 136/udp + snmp 161/udp + snmp-trap 162/udp + at-rtmp 201/udp + at-nbp 202/udp + at-3 203/udp + at-echo 204/udp + at-5 205/udp + at-zis 206/udp + at-7 207/udp + at-8 208/udp + biff 512/udp used by mail system to notify users + of new mail received; currently + receives messages only from + processes on the same machine + who 513/udp maintains data bases showing who's + logged in to machines on a local + net and the load average of the + machine + syslog 514/udp + talk 517/udp like tenex link, but across + machine - unfortunately, doesn't + use link protocol (this is actually + just a rendezvous port from which a + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 16] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + tcp connection is established) + ntalk 518/udp + utime 519/udp unixtime + router 520/udp local routing process (on site); + uses variant of Xerox NS routing + information protocol + timed 525/udp timeserver + netwall 533/udp for emergency broadcasts + new-rwho 550/udp new-who + rmonitor 560/udp rmonitord + monitor 561/udp + meter 571/udp udemon + elcsd 704/udp errlog copy/server daemon + loadav 750/udp + vid 769/udp + cadlock 770/udp + notify 773/udp + acmaint_dbd 774/udp + acmaint_transd 775/udp + wpages 776/udp + puparp 998/udp + applix 999/udp Applix ac + puprouter 999/udp + cadlock 1000/udp + hermes 1248/udp + wizard 2001/udp curry + globe 2002/udp + emce 2004/udp CCWS mm conf + oracle 2005/udp + raid-cc 2006/udp raid + raid-am 2007/udp + terminaldb 2008/udp + whosockami 2009/udp + pipe_server 2010/udp + servserv 2011/udp + raid-ac 2012/udp + raid-cd 2013/udp + raid-sf 2014/udp + raid-cs 2015/udp + bootserver 2016/udp + bootclient 2017/udp + rellpack 2018/udp + about 2019/udp + xinupageserver 2020/udp + xinuexpansion1 2021/udp + xinuexpansion2 2022/udp + xinuexpansion3 2023/udp + xinuexpansion4 2024/udp + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 17] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + xribs 2025/udp + scrabble 2026/udp + isis 2042/udp + isis-bcast 2043/udp + rimsl 2044/udp + cdfunc 2045/udp + sdfunc 2046/udp + dls 2047/udp + shilp 2049/udp + rmonitor_secure 5145/udp + xdsxdm 6558/udp + isode-dua 17007/udp + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 18] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + INTERNET MULTICAST ADDRESSES + + Host Extensions for IP Multicasting (RFC-1112) [43] specifies the + extensions required of a host implementation of the Internet Protocol + (IP) to support multicasting. Current addresses are listed below. + + 224.0.0.0 Reserved [43,JBP] + 224.0.0.1 All Hosts on this Subnet [43,JBP] + 224.0.0.2 All Gateways on this Subnet (proposed) [JBP] + 224.0.0.3 Unassigned [JBP] + 224.0.0.4 DVMRP Routers [140,JBP] + 224.0.0.5 OSPFIGP OSPFIGP All Routers [83,JXM1] + 224.0.0.6 OSPFIGP OSPFIGP Designated Routers [83,JXM1] + 244.0.0.7-244.0.0.255 Unassigned [JBP] + 224.0.1.0 VMTP Managers Group [17,DRC3] + 224.0.1.1 NTP Network Time Protocol [80,DLM1] + 224.0.1.2 SGI-Dogfight [AXC] + 224.0.1.3 Rwhod [SXD] + 224.0.1.4 VNP [DRC3] + 244.0.1.5-244.0.1.255 Unassigned [JBP] + 224.0.2.1 "rwho" Group (BSD) (unofficial) [JBP] + 232.x.x.x VMTP transient groups [17,DRC3] + + Note that when used on an Ethernet or IEEE 802 network, the 23 + low-order bits of the IP Multicast address are placed in the low- + order 23 bits of the Ethernet or IEEE 802 net multicast address + 1.0.94.0.0.0. See the next section on "IANA ETHERNET ADDRESS + BLOCK". + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 19] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + IANA ETHERNET ADDRESS BLOCK + + The IANA owns an Ethernet address block which may be used for + multicast address asignments or other special purposes. + + The address block in IEEE binary is (which is in bit transmission + order): + + 0000 0000 0000 0000 0111 1010 + + In the normal Internet dotted decimal notation this is 0.0.94 since + the bytes are transmitted higher order first and bits within bytes + are transmitted lower order first (see "Data Notation" in the + Introduction). + + IEEE CSMA/CD and Token Bus bit transmission order: 00 00 5E + + IEEE Token Ring bit transmission order: 00 00 7A + + Appearance on the wire (bits transmitted from left to right): + + 0 23 47 + | | | + 1000 0000 0000 0000 0111 1010 xxxx xxx0 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx + | | + Multicast Bit 0 = Internet Multicast + 1 = Assigned by IANA for + other uses + + Appearance in memory (bits transmitted right-to-left within octets, + octets transmitted left-to-right): + + 0 23 47 + | | | + 0000 0001 0000 0000 0101 1110 0xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx + | | + Multicast Bit 0 = Internet Multicast + 1 = Assigned by IANA for other uses + + The latter representation corresponds to the Internet standard bit- + order, and is the format that most programmers have to deal with. + Using this representation, the range of Internet Multicast addresses + is: + + 01-00-5E-00-00-00 to 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FF in hex, or + + 1.0.94.0.0.0 to 1.0.94.127.255.255 in dotted decimal + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 20] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + IP TOS PARAMETERS + + This documents the default Type-of-Service values that are currently + recommended for the most important Internet protocols. + + There are three binary TOS attributes: low delay, high throughput, + and high reliability; in each case, an attribute bit is turned on to + indicate "better". The three attributes cannot all be optimized + simultanously, and in fact the TOS algorithms that have been + discussed tend to make "better" values of the attributes mutually + exclusive. Therefore, the recommended values have at most one bit + on. + + Generally, protocols which are involved in direct interaction with a + human should select low delay, while data transfers which may involve + large blocks of data are need high throughput. Finally, high + reliability is most important for datagram-based Internet management + functions. + + Application protocols not included in these tables should be able to + make appropriate choice of low delay (1 0 0) or high throughput (0 1 + 0). + + The following are recommended values for TOS: + + ----- Type-of-Service Value ----- + + Low High High + Protocol Delay Throughput Reliability + + TELNET (1) 1 0 0 + + FTP + Control 1 0 0 + Data (2) 0 1 0 + + TFTP 1 0 0 + + SMTP (3) + Cmd phase 1 0 0 + DATA phase 0 1 0 + + Domain Name Service + UDP Query 1 0 0 + TCP Query 0 0 0 + Zone Tnsfr 0 1 0 + + NNTP 0 0 0 + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 21] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ICMP + Errors 0 0 0 + Queries 0 0 0 + + Any IGP 0 0 1 + + EGP 0 0 0 + + SNMP 0 0 1 + + BOOTP 0 0 0 + + Notes: + + (1) Includes all interactive user protocols (e.g., rlogin). + + (2) Includes all bulk data transfer protocols (e.g., rcp). + + (3) If the implementation does not support changing the TOS + during the lifetime of the connection, then the recommended + TOS on opening the connection is (0,0,0). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 22] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + IP TIME TO LIVE PARAMETER + + The current recommended default TTL for the Internet Protocol (IP) + RFC-791 [45,105] is 32. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 23] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + DOMAIN SYSTEM PARAMETERS + + The Internet Domain Naming System (DOMAIN) includes several + parameters. These are documented in RFC-1034, [81] and RFC-1035 + [82]. The CLASS parameter is listed here. The per CLASS parameters + are defined in separate RFCs as indicated. + + Domain System Parameters: + + Decimal Name References + ------- ---- ---------- + 0 Reserved [PM1] + 1 Internet (IN) [81,PM1] + 2 Unassigned [PM1] + 3 Chaos (CH) [PM1] + 4 Hessoid (HS) [PM1] + 5-65534 Unassigned [PM1] + 65535 Reserved + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 24] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + BOOTP PARAMETERS + + The Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) RFC-951 [36] describes an IP/UDP + bootstrap protocol (BOOTP) which allows a diskless client machine to + discover its own IP address, the address of a server host, and the + name of a file to be loaded into memory and executed. The BOOTP + Vendor Information Extensions RFC-1084 [117] proposes an addition to + the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP). + + Vendor Extensions are listed below: + + Tag Name Data Length Meaning References + --- ---- ----------- ------- ---------- + 0 Pad 0 None + 1 Subnet Mask 4 Subnet Mask Value + 2 Time Zone 4 Time Offset in + Seconds from UTC + 3 Gateways N N/4 Gateway addresses + 4 Time Server N N/4 Timeserver addresses + 5 Name Server N N/4 IEN-116 Server addresses + 6 Domain Server N N/4 DNS Server addresses + 7 Log Server N N/4 Logging Server addresses + 8 Quotes Server N N/4 Quotes Server addresses + 9 LPR Server N N/4 Printer Server addresses + 10 Impress Server N N/4 Impress Server addresses + 11 RLP Server N N/4 RLP Server addresses + 12 Hostname N Hostname string + 13 Boot File Size 2 Size of boot file in 512 byte + checks + 14 Merit Dump File Client to dump and name + the file to dump it to + 15-127 Unassigned + 128-154 Reserved + 255 End 0 None + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 25] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + NETWORK MANAGEMENT PARAMETERS + + For the management of hosts and gateways on the Internet a data + structure for the information has been defined. This data structure + should be used with any of several possible management protocols, such + as the "Simple Network Management Protocol" (SNMP) RFC-1098 [15], or + the "Common Management Information Protocol over TCP" (CMOT) [142]. + + The data structure is the "Structure and Indentification of Management + Information for TCP/IP-based Internets" (SMI) RFC-1065 [120], and the + "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based + Internets" (MIB) [121]. + + The SMI includes the provision for parameters or codes to indicate + experimental or private data structures. These parameter assignments + are listed here. + + The older "Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol" (SGMP) RFC-1028 [37] + also defined a data structure. The parameter assignments used with + SGMP are included here for hist orical completeness. + + SMI Network Management Experimental Codes: + + Prefix: 1.3.6.1.3. + + Decimal Name Description References + ------- ---- ----------- ---------- + 0 Reserved [JKR1] + 1 CLNP ISO CLNP Objects [MTR] + 2 T1-Carrier T1 Carrier Objects [MTR] + 3 IEEE8023 Ethernet-like Objects [MTR] + 4 IEEE8025 Token Ring-like Objects [MTR] + + SMI Network Management Private Enterprise Codes: + + Prefix: 1.3.6.1.4.1. + + Decimal Name References + ------- ---- ---------- + 0 Reserved [JKR1] + 1 Proteon [GSM11] + 2 IBM [JXR] + 3 CMU [SXW] + 4 Unix [KXS] + 5 ACC [AB20] + 6 TWG [KZM] + 7 CAYMAN [BP52] + 8 NYSERNET [MS9] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 26] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 9 cisco [GXS] + 10 NSC [GS123] + 11 HP [RDXS] + 12 Epilogue [KA4] + 13 U of Tennessee [JDC20] + 14 BBN [RH6] + 15 Xylogics, Inc. [JRL3] + 16 Unisys [UXW] + 17 Canstar [SXP] + 18 Wellfleet [JCB1] + 19 TRW [GGB2] + 20 MIT [JR35] + 21 EON [MXW] + 22 Spartacus [YXK] + 23 Excelan [RXB] + 24 Spider Systems [VXW] + 25 NSFNET [HWB] + 26 Hughes LAN Systems [AXC1] + 27 Intergraph [SXC] + 28 Interlan [FJK2] + 29 Vitalink Communications [FXB] + 30 Ulana [BXA] + 31 NSWC [SRN1] + 32 Santa Cruz Operation [KR35] + 33 Xyplex [BXS] + 34 Cray [HXE] + 35 Bell Northern Research [GXW] + 36 DEC [RXB1] + 37 Touch [BXB] + 38 Network Research Corp. [BXV] + 39 Baylor College of Medicine [SB98] + 40 NMFECC-LLNL [SXH] + 41 SRI [DW181] + 42 Sun Microsystems [DXY] + 43 3Com [TB6] + 44 CMC [DXP] + 45 SynOptics [BXB1] + 46 Cheyenne Software [RXH] + 47 Prime Computer [MXS] + 48 MCNC/North Carolina Data Network [KXW] + 49 Chipcom [JXC] + 50 Optical Data Systems [JXF] + 51 gated [JXH] + 52 Cabletron Systems [RXD] + 53 Apollo Computers [JXB] + 54 DeskTalk Systems, Inc. [DXK] + 55 SSDS [RXS] + 56 Castle Rock Computing [JXS1] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 27] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 57 MIPS Computer Systems [CXM] + 58 TGV, Inc. [KAA] + 59 Silicon Graphics, Inc. [RXJ] + 60 University of British Columbia [DXM] + 61 Merit [BXN] + 62 FiberCom [EXR] + 63 Apple Computer Inc [JXH1] + 64 Gandalf [HXK] + 65 Dartmouth [PXK] + 66 David Systems [DXM] + 67 Reuter [BXZ] + 68 Cornell [DC126] + 69 TMAC [MLS34] + 70 Locus Computing Corp. [AXS] + 71 NASA [SS92] + 72 Retix [AXM] + 73 Boeing [JXG] + 74 AT&T [AXC2] + 75 Ungermann-Bass [DXM] + 76 Digital Analysis Corp. [SXK] + 77 LAN Manager [JXG1] + 78 Netlabs [JB478] + 79 ICL [JXI] + 80 Auspex Systems [BXE] + 81 Lannet Company [EXR] + 82 Network Computing Devices [DM280] + 83 Raycom Systems [BXW1] + 84 Pirelli Focom Ltd. [SXL] + 85 Datability Software Systems [LXF] + 86 Network Application Technology [YXW] + 87 LINK (Lokales Informatik-Netz Karlsruhe) [GXS] + 88 NYU [BJR2] + 89 RND [RXN] + 90 InterCon Systems Corporation [AW90] + + SGMP Vendor Specific Codes: + + Prefix: 1,255, + + Decimal Name References + ------- ---- ---------- + 0 Reserved [JKR1] + 1 Proteon [JS18] + 2 IBM [JXR] + 3 CMU [SXW] + 4 Unix [MS9] + 5 ACC [AB20] + 6 TWG [MTR] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 28] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 7 CAYMAN [BP52] + 8 NYSERNET [MS9] + 9 cisco [GS2] + 10 BBN [RH6] + 11 Unassigned [JKR1] + 12 MIT [JR35] + 13-254 Unassigned [JKR1] + 255 Reserved [JKR1] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 29] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ARPANET AND MILNET LOGICAL ADDRESSES + + The ARPANET facility for "logical addressing" is described in RFC-878 + [57] and RFC-1005 [109]. A portion of the possible logical addresses + are reserved for standard uses. + + There are 49,152 possible logical host addresses. Of these, 256 are + reserved for assignment to well-known functions. Assignments for + well-known functions are made by the IANA. Assignments for other + logical host addresses are made by the NIC. + + Logical Address Assignments: + + Decimal Description References + ------- ----------- ---------- + 0 Reserved [JBP] + 1 The BBN Core Gateways [MB] + 2-254 Unassigned [JBP] + 255 Reserved [JBP] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 30] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ARPANET AND MILNET LINK NUMBERS + + The word "link" here refers to a field in the original ARPANET + Host/IMP interface leader. The link was originally defined as an 8- + bit field. Later specifications defined this field as the "message- + id" with a length of 12 bits. The name link now refers to the high + order 8 bits of this 12-bit message-id field. The Host/IMP interface + is defined in BBN Report 1822 [2]. + + The low-order 4 bits of the message-id field are called the sub-link. + Unless explicitly specified otherwise for a particular protocol, + there is no sender to receiver significance to the sub-link. The + sender may use the sub-link in any way he chooses (it is returned in + the RFNM by the destination IMP), the receiver should ignore the + sub-link. + + Link Assignments: + + Decimal Description References + ------- ----------- ---------- + 0-63 BBNCC Monitoring [MB] + 64-149 Unassigned [JBP] + 150 Xerox NS IDP [133,XEROX] + 151 Unassigned [JBP] + 152 PARC Universal Protocol [8,XEROX] + 153 TIP Status Reporting [JGH] + 154 TIP Accounting [JGH] + 155 Internet Protocol [regular] [105,JBP] + 156-158 Internet Protocol [experimental] [105,JBP] + 159 Figleaf Link [JBW1] + 160 Blacker Local Network Protocol [DM28] + 161-194 Unassigned [JBP] + 195 ISO-IP [64,RXM] + 196-247 Experimental Protocols [JBP] + 248-255 Network Maintenance [JGH] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 31] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ARPANET AND MILNET X.25 ADDRESS MAPPINGS + + All MILNET hosts are assigned addresses by the Defense Data Network + (DDN). The address of a MILNET host may be obtained from the Network + Information Center (NIC), represented as an ASCII text string in what + is called "host table format". This section describes the process by + which MILNET X.25 addresses may be derived from addresses in the NIC + host table format. + + A NIC host table address consists of the ASCII text string + representations of four decimal numbers separated by periods, + corresponding to the four octeted of a thirty-two bit Internet + address. The four decimal numbers are referred to in this section as + "n", "h' "l", and "i". Thus, a host table address may be represented + as: "n.h.l.i". Each of these four numbers will have either one, two, + or three decimal digits and will never have a value greater than 255. + For example, in the host table, address: "10.2.0.124", n=10, h=2, + l=0, and i=124. To convert a host table address to a MILNET X.25 + address: + + 1. If h < 64, the host table address corresponds to the X.25 + physical address: + + ZZZZ F IIIHHZZ (SS) + + where: + + ZZZZ = 0000 as required + + F = 0 because the address is a physical address; + + III is a three decimal digit respresentation of + "i", right-adjusted and padded with leading + zeros if required; + + HH is a two decimal digit representation of "h", + right-adjusted and padded with leading zeros + if required; + + ZZ = 00 and + + (SS) is optional + + In the example given above, the host table address 10.2.0.124 + corresponds to the X.25 physical address 000001240200. + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 32] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 2. If h > 64 or h = 64, the host table address corresponds to the + X.25 logical address + + ZZZZ F RRRRRZZ (SS) + + where: + + ZZZZ = 0000 as required + + F = 1 because the address is a logical address; + + RRRRR is a five decimal digit representation of + the result "r" of the calculation + + r = h * 256 + i + + (Note that the decimal representation of + "r" will always require five digits); + + ZZ = 00 and + + (SS) is optional + + Thus, the host table address 10.83.0.207 corresponds to the X.25 + logical address 000012145500. + + In both cases, the "n" and "l" fields of the host table address are + not used. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 33] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + IEEE 802 NUMBERS OF INTEREST + + Some of the networks of all classes are IEEE 802 Networks. These + systems may use a Link Service Access Point (LSAP) field in much the + same way the ARPANET uses the "link" field. Further, there is an + extension of the LSAP header called the Sub-Network Access Protocol + (SNAP). + + The IEEE likes to describe numbers in binary in bit transmission + order, which is the opposite of the big-endian order used throughout + the Internet protocol documentation. + + Assignments: + + Link Service Access Point Description References + ------------------------- ----------- ---------- + IEEE Internet + binary binary decimal + 00000000 00000000 0 Null LSAP [IEEE] + 01000000 00000010 2 Indiv LLC Sublayer Mgt [IEEE] + 11000000 00000011 3 Group LLC Sublayer Mgt [IEEE] + 00100000 00000100 4 SNA Path Control [IEEE] + 01100000 00000110 6 Reserved (DOD IP) [104,JBP] + 01110000 00001110 14 PROWAY-LAN [IEEE] + 01110010 01001110 78 EIA-RS 511 [IEEE] + 01111010 01011110 94 ISI IP [JBP] + 01110001 10001110 142 PROWAY-LAN [IEEE] + 01010101 10101010 170 SNAP [IEEE] + 01111111 11111110 254 ISO DIS 8473 [64,JXJ] + 11111111 11111111 255 Global DSAP [IEEE] + + These numbers (and others) are assigned by the IEEE Standards Office. + The address is: IEEE Standards Office, 345 East 47th Street, New + York, N.Y. 10017, Attn: Vince Condello. Phone: (212) 705-7092. + + At an ad hoc special session on "IEEE 802 Networks and ARP", held + during the TCP Vendors Workshop (August 1986), an approach to a + consistent way to send DoD-IP datagrams and other IP related + protocols (such as the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP)) on 802 + networks was developed, using the SNAP extension (see RFC-1010 and + RFC-1042 [90]). + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 34] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ETHERNET NUMBERS OF INTEREST + + Many of the networks of all classes are Ethernets (10Mb) or + Experimental Ethernets (3Mb). These systems use a message "type" + field in much the same way the ARPANET uses the "link" field. + + If you need an Ethernet type, contact the Xerox Corporation, Xerox + Systems Institute, 475 Oakmead Parkway, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, Attn: + Ms. Fonda Pallone, (408) 737-4652. + + The following list is contributed unverified information from various + sources. + + Assignments: + + Ethernet Exp. Ethernet Description References + ------------- ------------- ----------- ---------- + decimal Hex decimal octal + 000 0000-05DC - - IEEE802.3 Length Field [XEROX] + 257 0101-01FF - - Experimental [XEROX] + 512 0200 512 1000 XEROX PUP (see 0A00) [8,XEROX] + 513 0201 - - PUP Addr Trans (see 0A01)[XEROX] + 1536 0600 1536 3000 XEROX NS IDP [133,XEROX] + 2048 0800 513 1001 DOD IP [105,JBP] + 2049 0801 - - X.75 Internet [XEROX] + 2050 0802 - - NBS Internet [XEROX] + 2051 0803 - - ECMA Internet [XEROX] + 2052 0804 - - Chaosnet [XEROX] + 2053 0805 - - X.25 Level 3 [XEROX] + 2054 0806 - - ARP [88,JBP] + 2055 0807 - - XNS Compatability [XEROX] + 2076 081C - - Symbolics Private [DCP1] + 2184 0888-088A - - Xyplex [XEROX] + 2304 0900 - - Ungermann-Bass net debugr[XEROX] + 2560 0A00 - - Xerox IEEE802.3 PUP [XEROX] + 2561 0A01 - - PUP Addr Trans [XEROX] + 2989 0BAD - - Banyan Systems [XEROX] + 4096 1000 - - Berkeley Trailer nego [XEROX] + 4097 1001-100F - - Berkeley Trailer encap/IP[XEROX] + 5632 1600 - - Valid Systems [XEROX] + 16962 4242 - - PCS Basic Block Protocol [XEROX] + 21000 5208 - - BBN Simnet [XEROX] + 24576 6000 - - DEC Unassigned (Exp.) [XEROX] + 24577 6001 - - DEC MOP Dump/Load [XEROX] + 24578 6002 - - DEC MOP Remote Console [XEROX] + 24579 6003 - - DEC DECNET Phase IV Route[XEROX] + 24580 6004 - - DEC LAT [XEROX] + 24581 6005 - - DEC Diagnostic Protocol [XEROX] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 35] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 24582 6006 - - DEC Customer Protocol [XEROX] + 24583 6007 - - DEC LAVC, SCA [XEROX] + 24584 6008-6009 - - DEC Unassigned [XEROX] + 24586 6010-6014 - - 3Com Corporation [XEROX] + 28672 7000 - - Ungermann-Bass download [XEROX] + 28674 7002 - - Ungermann-Bass dia/loop [XEROX] + 28704 7020-7029 - - LRT [XEROX] + 28720 7030 - - Proteon [XEROX] + 28724 7034 - - Cabletron [XEROX] + 32771 8003 - - Cronus VLN [131,DT15] + 32772 8004 - - Cronus Direct [131,DT15] + 32773 8005 - - HP Probe [XEROX] + 32774 8006 - - Nestar [XEROX] + 32776 8008 - - AT&T [XEROX] + 32784 8010 - - Excelan [XEROX] + 32787 8013 - - SGI diagnostics [AXC] + 32788 8014 - - SGI network games [AXC] + 32789 8015 - - SGI reserved [AXC] + 32780 8016 - - SGI bounce server [AXC] + 32783 8019 - - Apollo Computers [XEROX] + 32815 802E - - Tymshare [XEROX] + 32816 802F - - Tigan, Inc. [XEROX] + 32821 8035 - - Reverse ARP [48,JXM] + 32822 8036 - - Aeonic Systems [XEROX] + 32824 8038 - - DEC LANBridge [XEROX] + 32825 8039-803C - - DEC Unassigned [XEROX] + 32829 803D - - DEC Ethernet Encryption [XEROX] + 32830 803E - - DEC Unassigned [XEROX] + 32831 803F - - DEC LAN Traffic Monitor [XEROX] + 32832 8040-8042 - - DEC Unassigned [XEROX] + 32836 8044 - - Planning Research Corp. [XEROX] + 32838 8046 - - AT&T [XEROX] + 32839 8047 - - AT&T [XEROX] + 32841 8049 - - ExperData [XEROX] + 32859 805B - - Stanford V Kernel exp. [XEROX] + 32860 805C - - Stanford V Kernel prod. [XEROX] + 32861 805D - - Evans & Sutherland [XEROX] + 32864 8060 - - Little Machines [XEROX] + 32866 8062 - - Counterpoint Computers [XEROX] + 32869 8065-8066 - - Univ. of Mass. @ Amherst [XEROX] + 32871 8067 - - Veeco Integrated Auto. [XEROX] + 32872 8068 - - General Dynamics [XEROX] + 32873 8069 - - AT&T [XEROX] + 32874 806A - - Autophon [XEROX] + 32876 806C - - ComDesign [XEROX] + 32877 806D - - Computgraphic Corp. [XEROX] + 32878 806E-8077 - - Landmark Graphics Corp. [XEROX] + 32890 807A - - Matra [XEROX] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 36] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 32891 807B - - Dansk Data Elektronik [XEROX] + 32892 807C - - Merit Internodal [HWB] + 32893 807D-807F - - Vitalink Communications [XEROX] + 32896 8080 - - Vitalink TransLAN III [XEROX] + 32897 8081-8083 - - Counterpoint Computers [XEROX] + 32923 809B - - Appletalk [XEROX] + 32924 809C-809E - - Datability [XEROX] + 32927 809F - - Spider Systems Ltd. [XEROX] + 32931 80A3 - - Nixdorf Computers [XEROX] + 32932 80A4-80B3 - - Siemens Gammasonics Inc. [XEROX] + 32960 80C0-80C3 - - DCA Data Exchange Cluster[XEROX] + 32966 80C6 - - Pacer Software [XEROX] + 32967 80C7 - - Applitek Corporation [XEROX] + 32968 80C8-80CC - - Intergraph Corporation [XEROX] + 32973 80CD-80CE - - Harris Corporation [XEROX] + 32974 80CF-80D2 - - Taylor Instrument [XEROX] + 32979 80D3-80D4 - - Rosemount Corporation [XEROX] + 32981 80D5 - - IBM SNA Service on Ether [XEROX] + 32989 80DD - - Varian Associates [XEROX] + 32990 80DE-80DF - - Integrated Solutions TRFS[XEROX] + 32992 80E0-80E3 - - Allen-Bradley [XEROX] + 32996 80E4-80F0 - - Datability [XEROX] + 33010 80F2 - - Retix [XEROX] + 33011 80F3 - - AppleTalk AARP (Kinetics)[XEROX] + 33012 80F4-80F5 - - Kinetics [XEROX] + 33015 80F7 - - Apollo Computer [XEROX] + 33023 80FF-8103 - - Wellfleet Communications [XEROX] + 33031 8107-8109 - - Symbolics Private [XEROX] + 33072 8130 - - Waterloo Microsystems [XEROX] + 33073 8131 - - VG Laboratory Systems [XEROX] + 33079 8137-8138 - - Novell, Inc. [XEROX] + 33081 8139-813D - - KTI [XEROX] + 33100 814C - - SNMP [JKR1] + 36864 9000 - - Loopback [XEROX] + 36865 9001 - - 3Com(Bridge) XNS Sys Mgmt[XEROX] + 36866 9002 - - 3Com(Bridge) TCP-IP Sys [XEROX] + 36867 9003 - - 3Com(Bridge) loop detect [XEROX] + 65280 FF00 - - BBN VITAL-LanBridge cache[XEROX] + + The standard for transmission of IP datagrams over Ethernets and + Experimental Ethernets is specified in RFC-894 [61] and RFC-895 [91] + respectively. + + NOTE: Ethernet 48-bit address blocks are assigned by the IEEE. + + IEEE Standards Office, 345 East 47th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017, + Attn: Vince Condello. Phone: (212) 705-7092. + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 37] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ETHERNET VENDOR ADDRESS COMPONENTS + + Ethernet hardware addresses are 48 bits, expressed as 12 hexadecimal + digits (0-9, plus A-F, capitalized). These 12 hex digits consist of + the first/left 6 digits (which should match the vendor of the + Ethernet interface within the station) and the last/right 6 digits + which specify the interface serial number for that interface vendor. + + Ethernet addresses might be written unhyphenated (e.g., + 123456789ABC), or with one hyphen (e.g., 123456-789ABC), but should + be written hyphenated by octets (e.g., 12-34-56-78-9A-BC). + + These addresses are physical station addresses, not multicast nor + broadcast, so the second hex digit (reading from the left) will be + even, not odd. + + At present, it is not clear how the IEEE assigns Ethernet block + addresses. Whether in blocks of 2**24 or 2**25, and whether + multicasts are assigned with that block or separately. A portion of + the vendor block address is reportedly assigned serially, with the + other portion intentionally assigned randomly. If there is a global + algorithm for which addresses are designated to be physical (in a + chipset) versus logical (assigned in software), or globally-assigned + versus locally-assigned addresses, some of the known addresses do not + follow the scheme (e.g., AA0003; 02xxxx). + + 00000C Cisco + 00000F NeXT + 000010 Sytek + 00001D Cabletron + 000020 DIAB (Data Intdustrier AB) + 000022 Visual Technology + 00002A TRW + 00005A S & Koch + 00005E IANA + 000065 Network General + 00006B MIPS + 000077 MIPS + 00007A Ardent + 000089 Cayman Systems Gatorbox + 000093 Proteon + 00009F Ameristar Technology + 0000A2 Wellfleet + 0000A3 Network Application Technology + 0000A6 Network General (internal assignment, not for products) + 0000A7 NCD X-terminals + 0000A9 Network Systems + 0000AA Xerox Xerox machines + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 38] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 0000B3 CIMLinc + 0000B7 Dove Fastnet + 0000BC Allen-Bradley + 0000C0 Western Digital + 0000C6 HP Intelligent Networks Operation (formerly Eon Systems) + 0000C8 Altos + 0000C9 Emulex Terminal Servers + 0000D7 Dartmouth College (NED Router) + 0000D8 3Com? Novell? PS/2 + 0000DD Gould + 0000DE Unigraph + 0000E2 Acer Counterpoint + 0000EF Alantec + 0000FD High Level Hardvare (Orion, UK) + 000102 BBN BBN internal usage (not registered) + 001700 Kabel + 00802D Xylogics, Inc. Annex terminal servers + 00808C Frontier Software Development + 00AA00 Intel + 00DD00 Ungermann-Bass + 00DD01 Ungermann-Bass + 020701 MICOM/Interlan UNIBUS or QBUS machines, Apollo + 020406 BBN BBN internal usage (not registered) + 026086 Satelcom MegaPac (UK) + 02608C 3Com IBM PC; Imagen; Valid; Cisco + 02CF1F CMC Masscomp; Silicon Graphics; Prime EXL + 080002 3Com (Formerly Bridge) + 080003 ACC (Advanced Computer Communications) + 080005 Symbolics Symbolics LISP machines + 080008 BBN + 080009 Hewlett-Packard + 08000A Nestar Systems + 08000B Unisys + 080010 AT&T + 080011 Tektronix, Inc. + 080014 Excelan BBN Butterfly, Masscomp, Silicon Graphics + 080017 NSC + 08001A Data General + 08001B Data General + 08001E Apollo + 080020 Sun Sun machines + 080022 NBI + 080025 CDC + 080026 Norsk Data (Nord) + 080027 PCS Computer Systems GmbH + 080028 TI Explorer + 08002B DEC + 08002E Metaphor + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 39] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 08002F Prime Computer Prime 50-Series LHC300 + 080036 Intergraph CAE stations + 080037 Fujitsu-Xerox + 080038 Bull + 080039 Spider Systems + 080041 DCA Digital Comm. Assoc. + 080045 ???? (maybe Xylogics, but they claim not to know this number) + 080046 Sony + 080047 Sequent + 080049 Univation + 08004C Encore + 08004E BICC + 080056 Stanford University + 080058 ??? DECsystem-20 + 08005A IBM + 080067 Comdesign + 080068 Ridge + 080069 Silicon Graphics + 08006E Excelan + 080075 DDE (Danish Data Elektronik A/S) + 08007C Vitalink TransLAN III + 080080 XIOS + 080086 Imagen/QMS + 080087 Xyplex terminal servers + 080089 Kinetics AppleTalk-Ethernet interface + 08008B Pyramid + 08008D XyVision XyVision machines + 080090 Retix Inc Bridges + 484453 HDS ??? + 800010 AT&T [misrepresentation of 080010?] + AA0000 DEC obsolete + AA0001 DEC obsolete + AA0002 DEC obsolete + AA0003 DEC Global physical address for some DEC machines + AA0004 DEC Local logical address for systems running DECNET + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 40] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ETHERNET MULTICAST ADDRESSES + + Ethernet Type + Address Field Usage + + Multicast Addresses: + + 01-00-5E-00-00-00- 0800 Internet Multicast (RFC-1112) [43] + 01-00-5E-7F-FF-FF + 01-00-5E-80-00-00- ???? Internet reserved by IANA + 01-00-5E-FF-FF-FF + 01-80-C2-00-00-00 -802- Spanning tree (for bridges) + 09-00-02-04-00-01? 8080? Vitalink printer + 09-00-02-04-00-02? 8080? Vitalink management + 09-00-09-00-00-01 8005 HP Probe + 09-00-09-00-00-01 -802- HP Probe + 09-00-09-00-00-04 8005? HP DTC + 09-00-1E-00-00-00 8019? Apollo DOMAIN + 09-00-2B-00-00-00 6009? DEC MUMPS? + 09-00-2B-00-00-01 8039? DEC DSM/DTP? + 09-00-2B-00-00-02 803B? DEC VAXELN? + 09-00-2B-00-00-03 8038 DEC Lanbridge Traffic Monitor (LTM) + 09-00-2B-00-00-04 ???? DEC MAP End System Hello? + 09-00-2B-00-00-05 ???? DEC MAP Intermediate System Hello? + 09-00-2B-00-00-06 803D? DEC CSMA/CD Encryption? + 09-00-2B-00-00-07 8040? DEC NetBios Emulator? + 09-00-2B-00-00-0F 6004 DEC Local Area Transport (LAT) + 09-00-2B-00-00-1x ???? DEC Experimental + 09-00-2B-01-00-00 8038 DEC LanBridge Copy packets (All bridges) + 09-00-2B-01-00-01 8038 DEC LanBridge Hello packets (All local bridges) + 1 packet per second, sent by the + designated LanBridge + 09-00-2B-02-00-00 ???? DEC DNA Level 2 Routing Layer routers? + 09-00-2B-02-01-00 803C? DEC DNA Naming Service Advertisement? + 09-00-2B-02-01-01 803C? DEC DNA Naming Service Solicitation? + 09-00-2B-02-01-02 803E? DEC DNA Time Service? + 09-00-2B-03-xx-xx ???? DEC default filtering by bridges? + 09-00-2B-04-00-00 8041? DEC Local Area System Transport (LAST)? + 09-00-2B-23-00-00 803A? DEC Argonaut Console? + 09-00-4E-00-00-02? 8137? Novell IPX + 09-00-56-00-00-00- ???? Stanford reserved + 09-00-56-FE-FF-FF + 09-00-56-FF-00-00- 805C Stanford V Kernel, version 6.0 + 09-00-56-FF-FF-FF + 09-00-77-00-00-01 ???? Retix spanning tree bridges + 09-00-7C-02-00-05 8080? Vitalink diagnostics + 09-00-7C-05-00-01 8080? Vitalink gateway? + 0D-1E-15-BA-DD-06 ???? HP + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 41] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + AB-00-00-01-00-00 6001 DEC Maintenance Operation Protocol (MOP) + Dump/Load Assistance + AB-00-00-02-00-00 6002 DEC Maintenance Operation Protocol (MOP) + Remote Console + 1 System ID packet every 8-10 minutes, + by every: + DEC LanBridge + DEC DEUNA interface + DEC DELUA interface + DEC DEQNA interface (in a certain mode) + AB-00-00-03-00-00 6003 DECNET Phase IV end node Hello packets + 1 packet every 15 seconds, sent by + each DECNET host + AB-00-00-04-00-00 6003 DECNET Phase IV Router Hello packets + 1 packet every 15 seconds, sent by the + DECNET router + AB-00-00-05-00-00 ???? Reserved DEC + through + AB-00-03-FF-FF-FF + AB-00-03-00-00-00 6004 DEC Local Area Transport (LAT) - old + AB-00-04-00-xx-xx ???? Reserved DEC customer private use + AB-00-04-01-xx-yy 6007 DEC Local Area VAX Cluster groups + System Communication Architecture (SCA) + CF-00-00-00-00-00 9000 Ethernet Configuration Test protocol (Loopback) + + Broadcast Address: + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0600 XNS packets, Hello or gateway search? + 6 packets every 15 seconds, per XNS station + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0800 IP (e.g. RWHOD via UDP) as needed + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0804 CHAOS + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0806 ARP (for IP and CHAOS) as needed + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 0BAD Banyan + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 1600 VALID packets, Hello or gateway search? + 1 packets every 30 seconds, per VALID station + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 8035 Reverse ARP + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 807C Merit Internodal (INP) + FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF 809B EtherTalk + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 42] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + XNS PROTOCOL TYPES + + Assigned well-known socket numbers + + Routing Information 1 + Echo 2 + Router Error 3 + Experimental 40-77 + + Assigned internet packet types + + Routing Information 1 + Echo 2 + Error 3 + Packet Exchange 4 + Sequenced Packet 5 + PUP 12 + DoD IP 13 + Experimental 20-37 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 43] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + PROTOCOL/TYPE FIELD ASSIGNMENTS + + Below are two tables describing the arrangement of protocol fields or + type field assignments so that one could send NS Datagrams on the + ARPANET or Internet Datagrams on 10Mb Ethernet, and also protocol and + type fields so one could encapsulate each kind of Datagram in the + other. + + \ upper| DoD IP | PUP | NS IP | + lower \ | | | | + --------------|--------|--------|--------| + | Type | Type | Type | + 3Mb Ethernet | 1001 | 1000 | 3000 | + | octal | octal | octal | + --------------|--------|--------|--------| + | Type | Type | Type | + 10 Mb Ethernet| 0800 | 0200 | 0600 | + | hex | hex | hex | + --------------|--------|--------|--------| + | Link | Link | Link | + ARPANET | 155 | 152 | 150 | + | decimal| decimal| decimal| + --------------|--------|--------|--------| + + + + \ upper| DoD IP | PUP | NS IP | + lower \ | | | | + --------------|--------|--------|--------| + | |Protocol|Protocol| + DoD IP | X | 12 | 22 | + | | decimal| decimal| + --------------|--------|--------|--------| + | | | | + PUP | ? | X | ? | + | | | | + --------------|--------|--------|--------| + | Type | Type | | + NS IP | 13 | 12 | X | + | decimal| decimal| | + --------------|--------|--------|--------| + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 44] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + PRONET 80 TYPE NUMBERS + + Below is the current list of PRONET 80 Type Numbers. Note: a + protocol that is on this list does not necessarily mean that there is + any implementation of it on ProNET. + + Of these, protocols 1, 14, and 20 are the only ones that have ever + been seen in ARP packets. + + For reference, the header is (one byte/line): + + destination hardware address + source hardware address + data link header version (2) + data link header protocol number + data link header reserved (0) + data link header reserved (0) + + Some protocols have been known to tuck stuff in the reserved fields. + + Those who need a protocol number on ProNET-10/80 should contact John + Shriver (jas@proteon.com). + + 1 IP + 2 IP with trailing headers + 3 Address Resoloution Protocol + 4 Proteon HDLC + 5 VAX Debugging Protocol (MIT) + 10 Novell NetWare (IPX and pre-IPX) (old format, + 3 byte trailer) + 11 Vianetix + 12 PUP + 13 Watstar protocol (University of Waterloo) + 14 XNS + 15 Diganostics + 16 Echo protocol (link level) + 17 Banyan Vines + 20 DECnet (DEUNA Emulation) + 21 Chaosnet + 23 IEEE 802.2 or ISO 8802/2 Data Link + 24 Reverse Address Resolution Protocol + 29 TokenVIEW-10 + 31 AppleTalk LAP Data Packet + 33 Cornell Boot Server Location Protocol + 34 Novell NetWare IPX (new format, no trailer, + new XOR checksum) + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 45] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ADDRESS RESOLUTION PROTOCOL PARAMETERS + + The Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) specified in RFC-826 [88] has + several parameters. The assigned values for these parameters are + listed here. + + Assignments: + + Operation Code (op) + + 1 REQUEST + 2 REPLY + + Hardware Type (hrd) + + Type Description References + ---- ----------- ---------- + 1 Ethernet (10Mb) [JBP] + 2 Experimental Ethernet (3Mb) [JBP] + 3 Amateur Radio AX.25 [PXK] + 4 Proteon ProNET Token Ring [JBP] + 5 Chaos [GXP] + 6 IEEE 802 Networks [JBP] + 7 ARCNET [JBP] + 8 Hyperchannel [JBP] + 9 Lanstar [TU] + 10 Autonet Short Address [MXB1] + 11 LocalTalk [LXE] + 12 LocalNet (IBM PCNet or SYTEK LocalNET) [JXM] + + Protocol Type (pro) + + Use the same codes as listed in the section called "Ethernet + Numbers of Interest" (all hardware types use this code set for the + protocol type). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 46] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + REVERSE ADDRESS RESOLUTION PROTOCOL OPERATION CODES + + The Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (RARP) specified in RFC-903 + [48] has the following operation codes: + + Assignments: + + Operation Code (op) + + 3 request Reverse + 4 reply Reverse + + + DYNAMIC REVERSE ARP + + Assignments: + + Operation Code (op) + + 5 DRARP-Request + 6 DRARP-Reply + 7 DRARP-Error + + For further information, contact: David Brownell + (suneast!helium!db@Sun.COM). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 47] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + X.25 TYPE NUMBERS + + CCITT defines the high order two bits of the first octet of call user + data as follows: + + 00 - Used for other CCITT recomendations (such as X.29) + 01 - Reserved for use by "national" administrative + authorities + 10 - Reserved for use by international administrative authoorities + 11 - Reserved for arbitrary use between consenting DTEs + + Call User Data (hex) Protocol Reference + ------------------- -------- --------- + + 01 PAD [GS2] + C5 Blacker front-end descr dev [AGM] + CC IP [69,AGM]* + CD ISO-IP [AGM] + + * NOTE: ISO SC6/WG2 approved assignment in ISO 9577 (January 1990). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 48] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + PUBLIC DATA NETWORK NUMBERS + +One of the Internet Class A Networks is the international system of +Public Data Networks. This section lists the mapping between the +Internet Addresses and the Public Data Network Addresses (X.121). + +The numbers below are assigned for networks that are connected to the +Internet, and for independent networks. These independent networks +are marked with an asterisk preceding the number. + +Assignments: + + * Internet Public Data Net Description References + - -------------- ----------------- ----------- ---------- + 014.000.000.000 Reserved [JBP] + 014.000.000.001 3110-317-00035 00 PURDUE-TN [TN] + 014.000.000.002 3110-608-00027 00 UWISC-TN [TN] + 014.000.000.003 3110-302-00024 00 UDEL-TN [TN] + 014.000.000.004 2342-192-00149 23 UCL-VTEST [PK] + 014.000.000.005 2342-192-00300 23 UCL-TG [PK] + 014.000.000.006 2342-192-00300 25 UK-SATNET [PK] + 014.000.000.007 3110-608-00024 00 UWISC-IBM [MS56] + 014.000.000.008 3110-213-00045 00 RAND-TN [MO2] + 014.000.000.009 2342-192-00300 23 UCL-CS [PK] + 014.000.000.010 3110-617-00025 00 BBN-VAN-GW [JD21] + *014.000.000.011 2405-015-50300 00 CHALMERS [UXB] + 014.000.000.012 3110-713-00165 00 RICE [PAM6] + 014.000.000.013 3110-415-00261 00 DECWRL [PAM6] + 014.000.000.014 3110-408-00051 00 IBM-SJ [SA1] + 014.000.000.015 2041-117-01000 00 SHAPE [JFW] + 014.000.000.016 2628-153-90075 00 DFVLR4-X25 [GB7] + 014.000.000.017 3110-213-00032 00 ISI-VAN-GW [JD21] + 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 FGAN-SIEMENS-X25 [GB7] + 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25 [JFW] + 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET [AXH] + 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1 [VXT] + 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80329 02 FGAN-FGANFFMVAX-X25 [GB7] + *014.000.000.023 2624-589-00908 01 ECRC-X25 [PXD] + 014.000.000.024 2342-905-24242 83 UK-MOD-RSRE [JXE2] + 014.000.000.025 2342-905-24242 82 UK-VAN-RSRE [AXM] + 014.000.000.026 2624-522-80329 05 DFVLRSUN-X25 [GB7] + 014.000.000.027 2624-457-11015 90 SELETFMSUN-X25 [BXD] + 014.000.000.028 3110-408-00146 00 CDC-SVL [RAM57] + 014.000.000.029 2222-551-04400 00 SUN-CNUCE [ABB2] + 014.000.000.030 2222-551-04500 00 ICNUCEVM-CNUCE [ABB2] + 014.000.000.031 2222-551-04600 00 SPARE-CNUCE [ABB2] + 014.000.000.032 2222-551-04700 00 ICNUCEVX-CNUCE [ABB2] + 014.000.000.033 2222-551-04524 00 CISCO-CNUCE [ABB2] + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 49] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + 014.000.000.034 2342-313-00260 90 SPIDER-GW [AD67] + 014.000.000.035 2342-313-00260 91 SPIDER-EXP [AD67] + 014.000.000.036 2342-225-00101 22 PRAXIS-X25A [TXR] + 014.000.000.037 2342-225-00101 23 PRAXIS-X25B [TXR] + 014.000.000.038 2403-712-30250 00 DIAB-TABY-GW [FXB] + 014.000.000.039 2403-715-30100 00 DIAB-LKP-GW [FXB] + 014.000.000.040 2401-881-24038 00 DIAB-TABY1-GW [FXB] + 014.000.000.041 2041-170-10060 00 STC [TC27] + 014.000.000.042-014.255.255.254 Unassigned [JBP] + 014.255.255.255 Reserved [JBP] + + The standard for transmission of IP datagrams over the Public Data + Network is specified in RFC-877 [69]. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 50] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + TELNET OPTIONS + +The Telnet Protocol has a number of options that may be negotiated. +These options are listed here. "Official Internet Protocols" [118] +provides more detailed information. + + Options Name References + ------- ----------------------- ---------- + 0 Binary Transmission [110,JBP] + 1 Echo [111,JBP] + 2 Reconnection [42,JBP] + 3 Suppress Go Ahead [114,JBP] + 4 Approx Message Size Negotiation [133,JBP] + 5 Status [113,JBP] + 6 Timing Mark [115,JBP] + 7 Remote Controlled Trans and Echo [107,JBP] + 8 Output Line Width [40,JBP] + 9 Output Page Size [41,JBP] + 10 Output Carriage-Return Disposition [28,JBP] + 11 Output Horizontal Tab Stops [32,JBP] + 12 Output Horizontal Tab Disposition [31,JBP] + 13 Output Formfeed Disposition [29,JBP] + 14 Output Vertical Tabstops [34,JBP] + 15 Output Vertical Tab Disposition [33,JBP] + 16 Output Linefeed Disposition [30,JBP] + 17 Extended ASCII [136,JBP] + 18 Logout [25,MRC] + 19 Byte Macro [35,JBP] + 20 Data Entry Terminal [145,38,JBP] + 22 SUPDUP [26,27,MRC] + 22 SUPDUP Output [51,MRC] + 23 Send Location [68,EAK1] + 24 Terminal Type [128,MS56] + 25 End of Record [103,JBP] + 26 TACACS User Identification [1,BA4] + 27 Output Marking [125,SXS] + 28 Terminal Location Number [84,RN6] + 29 Telnet 3270 Regime [116,JXR] + 30 X.3 PAD [70,SL70] + 31 Negotiate About Window Size [139,DW183] + 32 Terminal Speed [57,CLH3] + 33 Remote Flow Control [58,CLH3] + 34 Linemode [9,DB14] + 35 X Display Location [75,GM23] + 255 Extended-Options-List [109,JBP] + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 51] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + MAIL ENCRYPTION TYPES + + RFC-822 specifies that Encryption Types for mail may be assigned. + There are currently no RFC-822 encryption types assigned. Please use + instead the Mail Privacy procedures defined in [71,72,66]. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 52] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + MACHINE NAMES + + These are the Official Machine Names as they appear in the Domain + Name System WKS records and the NIC Host Table. Their use is + described in RFC-952 [53]. + + A machine name or CPU type may be up to 40 characters taken from the + set of uppercase letters, digits, and the two punctuation characters + hyphen and slash. It must start with a letter, and end with a letter + or digit. + + + + + + ALTO DEC-1090 + ALTOS-6800 DEC-1090B + AMDAHL-V7 DEC-1090T + APOLLO DEC-2020T + ATARI-104ST DEC-2040 + ATT-3B1 DEC-2040T + ATT-3B20 DEC-2050T + ATT-7300 DEC-2060 + BBN-C/60 DEC-2060T + BURROUGHS-B/29 DEC-2065 + BURROUGHS-B/4800 DEC-FALCON + BUTTERFLY DEC-KS10 + C/30 DEC-VAX-11730 + C/70 DORADO + CADLINC DPS8/70M + CADR ELXSI-6400 + CDC-170 EVEREX-386 + CDC-170/750 FOONLY-F2 + CDC-173 FOONLY-F3 + CELERITY-1200 FOONLY-F4 + CLUB-386 GOULD + COMPAQ-386/20 GOULD-6050 + COMTEN-3690 GOULD-6080 + CP8040 GOULD-9050 + CRAY-1 GOULD-9080 + CRAY-X/MP H-316 + CRAY-2 H-60/68 + CTIWS-117 H-68 + DANDELION H-68/80 + DEC-10 H-89 + DEC-1050 HONEYWELL-DPS-6 + DEC-1077 HONEYWELL-DPS-8/70 + DEC-1080 HP3000 + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 53] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + HP3000/64 PDP-11 + IBM-158 PDP-11/3 + IBM-360/67 PDP-11/23 + IBM-370/3033 PDP-11/24 + IBM-3081 PDP-11/34 + IBM-3084QX PDP-11/40 + IBM-3101 PDP-11/44 + IBM-4331 PDP-11/45 + IBM-4341 PDP-11/50 + IBM-4361 PDP-11/70 + IBM-4381 PDP-11/73 + IBM-4956 PE-7/32 + IBM-6152 PE-3205 + IBM-PC PERQ + IBM-PC/AT PLEXUS-P/60 + IBM-PC/RT PLI + IBM-PC/XT PLURIBUS + IBM-SERIES/1 PRIME-2350 + IMAGEN PRIME-2450 + IMAGEN-8/300 PRIME-2755 + IMSAI PRIME-9655 + INTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS PRIME-9755 + INTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS-68K PRIME-9955II + INTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS-CREATOR PRIME-2250 + INTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS-CREATOR-8 PRIME-2655 + INTEL-386 PRIME-9955 + INTEL-IPSC PRIME-9950 + IS-1 PRIME-9650 + IS-68010 PRIME-9750 + LMI PRIME-2250 + LSI-11 PRIME-750 + LSI-11/2 PRIME-850 + LSI-11/23 PRIME-550II + LSI-11/73 PYRAMID-90 + M68000 PYRAMID-90MX + MAC-II PYRAMID-90X + MASSCOMP RIDGE + MC500 RIDGE-32 + MC68000 RIDGE-32C + MICROPORT ROLM-1666 + MICROVAX S1-MKIIA + MICROVAX-I SMI + MV/8000 SEQUENT-BALANCE-8000 + NAS3-5 SIEMENS + NCR-COMTEN-3690 SILICON-GRAPHICS + NEXT/N1000-316 SILICON-GRAPHICS-IRIS + NOW SGI-IRIS-2400 + ONYX-Z8000 SGI-IRIS-2500 + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 54] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + SGI-IRIS-3010 SUN-3/60 + SGI-IRIS-3020 SUN-3/75 + SGI-IRIS-3030 SUN-3/80 + SGI-IRIS-3110 SUN-3/110 + SGI-IRIS-3115 SUN-3/140 + SGI-IRIS-3120 SUN-3/150 + SGI-IRIS-3130 SUN-3/160 + SGI-IRIS-4D/20 SUN-3/180 + SGI-IRIS-4D/20G SUN-3/200 + SGI-IRIS-4D/25 SUN-3/260 + SGI-IRIS-4D/25G SUN-3/280 + SGI-IRIS-4D/25S SUN-3/470 + SGI-IRIS-4D/50 SUN-3/480 + SGI-IRIS-4D/50G SUN-4/60 + SGI-IRIS-4D/50GT SUN-4/110 + SGI-IRIS-4D/60 SUN-4/150 + SGI-IRIS-4D/60G SUN-4/200 + SGI-IRIS-4D/60T SUN-4/260 + SGI-IRIS-4D/60GT SUN-4/280 + SGI-IRIS-4D/70 SUN-4/330 + SGI-IRIS-4D/70G SUN-4/370 + SGI-IRIS-4D/70GT SUN-4/390 + SGI-IRIS-4D/80GT SUN-50 + SGI-IRIS-4D/80S SUN-100 + SGI-IRIS-4D/120GTX SUN-120 + SGI-IRIS-4D/120S SUN-130 + SGI-IRIS-4D/210GTX SUN-150 + SGI-IRIS-4D/210S SUN-170 + SGI-IRIS-4D/220GTX SUN-386i/250 + SGI-IRIS-4D/220S SUN-68000 + SGI-IRIS-4D/240GTX SYMBOLICS-3600 + SGI-IRIS-4D/240S SYMBOLICS-3670 + SGI-IRIS-4D/280GTX SYMMETRIC-375 + SGI-IRIS-4D/280S SYMULT + SGI-IRIS-CS/12 TANDEM-TXP + SGI-IRIS-4SERVER-8 TANDY-6000 + SPERRY-DCP/10 TEK-6130 + SUN TI-EXPLORER + SUN-2 TP-4000 + SUN-2/50 TRS-80 + SUN-2/100 UNIVAC-1100 + SUN-2/120 UNIVAC-1100/60 + SUN-2/130 UNIVAC-1100/62 + SUN-2/140 UNIVAC-1100/63 + SUN-2/150 UNIVAC-1100/64 + SUN-2/160 UNIVAC-1100/70 + SUN-2/170 UNIVAC-1160 + SUN-3/50 UNKNOWN + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 55] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + VAX-11/725 + VAX-11/730 + VAX-11/750 + VAX-11/780 + VAX-11/785 + VAX-11/790 + VAX-11/8600 + VAX-8600 + WANG-PC002 + WANG-VS100 + WANG-VS400 + WYSE-386 + XEROX-1108 + XEROX-8010 + ZENITH-148 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 56] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + SYSTEM NAMES + + These are the Official System Names as they appear in the Domain Name + System WKS records and the NIC Host Table. Their use is described in + RFC-952 [53]. + + A system name may be up to 40 characters taken from the set of upper- + case letters, digits, and the two punctuation characters hyphen and + slash. It must start with a letter, and end with a letter or digit. + + AEGIS MACOS TP3010 + APOLLO MINOS TRSDOS + BS-2000 MOS ULTRIX + CEDAR MPE5 UNIX + CGW MSDOS UNIX-BSD + CHORUS MULTICS UNIX-V1AT + CHRYSALIS MVS UNIX-V + CMOS MVS/SP UNIX-V.1 + CMS NEXUS UNIX-V.2 + COS NMS UNIX-V.3 + CPIX NONSTOP UNIX-PC + CTOS NOS-2 UNKNOWN + CTSS OS/DDP UT2D + DCN OS4 V + DDNOS OS86 VM + DOMAIN OSX VM/370 + DOS PCDOS VM/CMS + EDX PERQ/OS VM/SP + ELF PLI VMS + EMBOS PSDOS/MIT VMS/EUNICE + EMMOS PRIMOS VRTX + EPOS RMX/RDOS WAITS + FOONEX ROS WANG + FUZZ RSX11M X11R3 + GCOS SATOPS XDE + GPOS SCO-XENIX/386 XENIX + HDOS SCS + IMAGEN SIMP + INTERCOM SUN + IMPRESS SUN OS 3.5 + INTERLISP SUN OS 4.0 + IOS SWIFT + IRIX TAC + ISI-68020 TANDEM + ITS TENEX + LISP TOPS10 + LISPM TOPS20 + LOCUS TOS + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 57] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + PROTOCOL AND SERVICE NAMES + + These are the Official Protocol Names as they appear in the Domain + Name System WKS records and the NIC Host Table. Their use is + described in RFC-952 [53]. + + A protocol or service may be up to 40 characters taken from the set + of uppercase letters, digits, and the punctuation character hyphen. + It must start with a letter, and end with a letter or digit. + + ARGUS - ARGUS Protocol + ARP - Address Resolution Protocol + AUTH - Authentication Service + BBN-RCC-MON - BBN RCC Monitoring + BL-IDM - Britton Lee Intelligent Database Machine + BOOTP - Bootstrap Protocol + BOOTPC - Bootstrap Protocol Client + BOOTPS - Bootstrap Protocol Server + BR-SAT-MON - Backroom SATNET Monitoring + CFTP - CFTP + CHAOS - CHAOS Protocol + CHARGEN - Character Generator Protocol + CISCO-FNA - CISCO FNATIVE + CISCO-TNA - CISCO TNATIVE + CISCO-SYS - CISCO SYSMAINT + CLOCK - DCNET Time Server Protocol + CMOT - Common Mgmnt Info Services and Protocol over TCP/IP + COOKIE-JAR - Authentication Scheme + CSNET-NS - CSNET Mailbox Nameserver Protocol + DAYTIME - Daytime Protocol + DCN-MEAS - DCN Measurement Subsystems Protocol + DCP - Device Control Protocol + DGP - Dissimilar Gateway Protocol + DISCARD - Discard Protocol + DOMAIN - Domain Name System + ECHO - Echo Protocol + EGP - Exterior Gateway Protocol + EMCON - Emission Control Protocol + EMFIS-CNTL - EMFIS Control Service + EMFIS-DATA - EMFIS Data Service + FINGER - Finger Protocol + FTP - File Transfer Protocol + FTP-DATA - File Transfer Protocol Data + GGP - Gateway Gateway Protocol + GRAPHICS - Graphics Protocol + HMP - Host Monitoring Protocol + HOST2-NS - Host2 Name Server + HOSTNAME - Hostname Protocol + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 58] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + ICMP - Internet Control Message Protocol + IGMP - Internet Group Management Protocol + IGP - Interior Gateway Protocol + IMAP2 - Interim Mail Access Protocol version 2 + INGRES-NET - INGRES-NET Service + IP - Internet Protocol + IPCU - Internet Packet Core Utility + IPPC - Internet Pluribus Packet Core + IP-ARC - Internet Protocol on ARCNET + IP-ARPA - Internet Protocol on ARPANET + IP-DC - Internet Protocol on DC Networks + IP-DVMRP - Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol + IP-E - Internet Protocol on Ethernet Networks + IP-EE - Internet Protocol on Exp. Ethernet Nets + IP-FDDI - Transmission of IP over FDDI + IP-HC - Internet Protocol on Hyperchannnel + IP-IEEE - Internet Protocol on IEEE 802 + IP-IPX - Transmission of 802.2 over IPX Networks + IP-MTU - IP MTU Discovery Options + IP-NETBIOS - Internet Protocol Datagrams over NetBIOS Networks + IP-SLIP - Transmission of IP over Serial Lines + IP-WB - Internet Protocol on Wideband Network + IP-X25 - Internet Protocol on X.25 Networks + IRTP - Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol + ISI-GL - ISI Graphics Language Protocol + ISO-TP4 - ISO Transport Protocol Class 4 + ISO-TSAP - ISO TSAP + LA-MAINT - IMP Logical Address Maintenance + LARP - Locus Address Resoultion Protocol + LDP - Loader Debugger Protocol + LEAF-1 - Leaf-1 Protocol + LEAF-2 - Leaf-2 Protocol + LINK - Link Protocol + LOC-SRV - Location Service + LOGIN - Login Host Protocol + MAIL - Format of Electronic Mail Messages + MERIT-INP - MERIT Internodal Protocol + METAGRAM - Metagram Relay + MIB - Management Information Base + MIT-ML-DEV - MIT ML Device + MFE-NSP - MFE Network Services Protocol + MIT-SUBNET - MIT Subnet Support + MIT-DOV - MIT Dover Spooler + MPM - Internet Message Protocol (Multimedia Mail) + MPM-FLAGS - MPM Flags Protocol + MPM-SND - MPM Send Protocol + MSG-AUTH - MSG Authentication Protocol + MSG-ICP - MSG ICP Protocol + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 59] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + MUX - Multiplexing Protocol + NAMESERVER - Host Name Server + NETBIOS-DGM - NETBIOS Datagram Service + NETBIOS-NS - NETBIOS Name Service + NETBIOS-SSN - NETBIOS Session Service + NETBLT - Bulk Data Transfer Protocol + NETED - Network Standard Text Editor + NETRJS - Remote Job Service + NI-FTP - NI File Transfer Protocol + NI-MAIL - NI Mail Protocol + NICNAME - Who Is Protocol + NFILE - A File Access Protocol + NNTP - Network News Transfer Protocol + NSW-FE - NSW User System Front End + NTP - Network Time Protocol + NVP-II - Network Voice Protocol + OSPF - Open Shortest Path First Interior GW Protocol + PCMAIL - Pcmail Transport Protocol + POP2 - Post Office Protocol - Version 2 + POP3 - Post Office Protocol - Version 3 + PPP - Point-to-Point Protocol + PRM - Packet Radio Measurement + PUP - PUP Protocol + PWDGEN - Password Generator Protocol + QUOTE - Quote of the Day Protocol + RARP - A Reverse Address Resolution Protocol + RATP - Reliable Asynchronous Transfer Protocol + RDP - Reliable Data Protocol + RIP - Routing Information Protocol + RJE - Remote Job Entry + RLP - Resource Location Protocol + RTELNET - Remote Telnet Service + RVD - Remote Virtual Disk Protocol + SAT-EXPAK - Satnet and Backroom EXPAK + SAT-MON - SATNET Monitoring + SEP - Sequential Exchange Protocol + SFTP - Simple File Transfer Protocol + SGMP - Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol + SNMP - Simple Network Management Protocol + SMI - Structure of Management Information + SMTP - Simple Mail Transfer Protocol + SQLSRV - SQL Service + ST - Stream Protocol + STATSRV - Statistics Service + SU-MIT-TG - SU/MIT Telnet Gateway Protocol + SUN-RPC - SUN Remote Procedure Call + SUPDUP - SUPDUP Protocol + SUR-MEAS - Survey Measurement + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 60] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + SWIFT-RVF - Remote Virtual File Protocol + TACACS-DS - TACACS-Database Service + TACNEWS - TAC News + TCP - Transmission Control Protocol + TELNET - Telnet Protocol + TFTP - Trivial File Transfer Protocol + THINWIRE - Thinwire Protocol + TIME - Time Server Protocol + TP-TCP - ISO Transport Service on top of the TCP + TRUNK-1 - Trunk-1 Protocol + TRUNK-2 - Trunk-2 Protocol + UCL - University College London Protocol + UDP - User Datagram Protocol + NNTP - Network News Transfer Protocol + USERS - Active Users Protocol + UUCP-PATH - UUCP Path Service + VIA-FTP - VIA Systems-File Transfer Protocol + VISA - VISA Protocol + VMTP - Versatile Message Transaction Protocol + WB-EXPAK - Wideband EXPAK + WB-MON - Wideband Monitoring + XNET - Cross Net Debugger + XNS-IDP - Xerox NS IDP + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 61] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + TERMINAL TYPE NAMES + +These are the Official Terminal Type Names. Their use is described in +RFC-930 [128]. The maximum length of a name is 40 characters. + +A terminal names may be up to 40 characters taken from the set of upper- +case letters, digits, and the two punctuation characters hyphen and +slash. It must start with a letter, and end with a letter or digit. + + ADDS-CONSUL-980 DATAMEDIA-1521 + ADDS-REGENT-100 DATAMEDIA-2500 + ADDS-REGENT-20 DATAMEDIA-3025 + ADDS-REGENT-200 DATAMEDIA-3025A + ADDS-REGENT-25 DATAMEDIA-3045 + ADDS-REGENT-40 DATAMEDIA-3045A + ADDS-REGENT-60 DATAMEDIA-DT80/1 + ADDS-VIEWPOINT DATAPOINT-2200 + ADDS-VIEWPOINT-60 DATAPOINT-3000 + AED-512 DATAPOINT-3300 + AMPEX-DIALOGUE-210 DATAPOINT-3360 + AMPEX-DIALOGUE-80 DEC-DECWRITER-I + AMPEX-210 DEC-DECWRITER-II + AMPEX-230 DEC-GIGI + ANDERSON-JACOBSON-510 DEC-GT40 + ANDERSON-JACOBSON-630 DEC-GT40A + ANDERSON-JACOBSON-832 DEC-GT42 + ANDERSON-JACOBSON-841 DEC-LA120 + ANN-ARBOR-AMBASSADOR DEC-LA30 + ANSI DEC-LA36 + ARDS DEC-LA38 + BITGRAPH DEC-VT05 + BUSSIPLEXER DEC-VT100 + CALCOMP-565 DEC-VT101 + CDC-456 DEC-VT102 + CDI-1030 DEC-VT125 + CDI-1203 DEC-VT131 + C-ITOH-101 DEC-VT132 + C-ITOH-50 DEC-VT200 + C-ITOH-80 DEC-VT220 + CLNZ DEC-VT240 + COMPUCOLOR-II DEC-VT241 + CONCEPT-100 DEC-VT300 + CONCEPT-104 DEC-VT320 + CONCEPT-108 DEC-VT340 + DATA-100 DEC-VT50 + DATA-GENERAL-6053 DEC-VT50H + DATAGRAPHIX-132A DEC-VT52 + DATAMEDIA-1520 DEC-VT55 + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 62] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + DEC-VT61 HP-2649A + DEC-VT62 IBM-1050 + DELTA-DATA-5000 IBM-2741 + DELTA-DATA-NIH-7000 IBM-3101 + DELTA-TELTERM-2 IBM-3101-10 + DIABLO-1620 IBM-3151 + DIABLO-1640 IBM-3275-2 + DIGILOG-333 IBM-3276-2 + DTC-300S IBM-3276-3 + DTC-382 IBM-3276-4 + EDT-1200 IBM-3277-2 + EXECUPORT-4000 IBM-3278-2 + EXECUPORT-4080 IBM-3278-3 + FACIT-TWIST-4440 IBM-3278-4 + FREEDOM-100 IBM-3278-5 + FREEDOM-110 IBM-3279-2 + FREEDOM-200 IBM-3279-3 + GENERAL-TERMINAL-100A IBM-5151 + GENERAL-TERMINAL-101 IBM-5154 + GIPSI-TX-M IBM-5081 + GIPSI-TX-ME IBM-6153 + GIPSI-TX-C4 IBM-6154 + GIPSI-TX-C8 IBM-6155 + GSI IBM-AED + HAZELTINE-1420 IBM-3278-2-E + HAZELTINE-1500 IBM-3278-3-E + HAZELTINE-1510 IBM-3278-4-E + HAZELTINE-1520 IBM-3278-5-E + HAZELTINE-1552 IBM-3279-2-E + HAZELTINE-2000 IBM-3279-3-E + HAZELTINE-ESPRIT IMLAC + HP-2392 INFOTON-100 + HP-2621 INFOTON-400 + HP-2621A INFOTONKAS + HP-2621P ISC-8001 + HP-2623 LSI-ADM-1 + HP-2626 LSI-ADM-11 + HP-2626A LSI-ADM-12 + HP-2626P LSI-ADM-2 + HP-2627 LSI-ADM-20 + HP-2640 LSI-ADM-22 + HP-2640A LSI-ADM-220 + HP-2640B LSI-ADM-3 + HP-2645 LSI-ADM-31 + HP-2645A LSI-ADM-3A + HP-2648 LSI-ADM-42 + HP-2648A LSI-ADM-5 + HP-2649 MEMOREX-1240 + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 63] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + MICROBEE TELETEC-DATASCREEN + MICROTERM-ACT-IV TELETERM-1030 + MICROTERM-ACT-V TELETYPE-33 + MICROTERM-ERGO-301 TELETYPE-35 + MICROTERM-MIME-1 TELETYPE-37 + MICROTERM-MIME-2 TELETYPE-38 + MICROTERM-ACT-5A TELETYPE-40 + MICROTERM-TWIST TELETYPE-43 + NEC-5520 TELEVIDEO-910 + NETRONICS TELEVIDEO-912 + NETWORK-VIRTUAL-TERMINAL TELEVIDEO-920 + OMRON-8025AG TELEVIDEO-920B + PERKIN-ELMER-550 TELEVIDEO-920C + PERKIN-ELMER-1100 TELEVIDEO-925 + PERKIN-ELMER-1200 TELEVIDEO-955 + PERQ TELEVIDEO-950 + PLASMA-PANEL TELEVIDEO-970 + QUME-SPRINT-5 TELEVIDEO-975 + QUME-101 TERMINET-1200 + QUME-102 TERMINET-300 + SOROC TI-700 + SOROC-120 TI-733 + SOUTHWEST-TECHNICAL-PRODUCTS-CT82 TI-735 + SUN TI-743 + SUPERBEE TI-745 + SUPERBEE-III-M TI-800 + TEC TYCOM + TEKTRONIX-4006 UNIVAC-DCT-500 + TEKTRONIX-4010 VIDEO-SYSTEMS-1200 + TEKTRONIX-4012 VIDEO-SYSTEMS-5000 + TEKTRONIX-4013 VOLKER-CRAIG-303 + TEKTRONIX-4014 VOLKER-CRAIG-303A + TEKTRONIX-4023 VOLKER-CRAIG-404 + TEKTRONIX-4024 VISUAL-200 + TEKTRONIX-4025 VISUAL-55 + TEKTRONIX-4027 WYSE-30 + TEKTRONIX-4105 WYSE-50 + TEKTRONIX-4107 WYSE-60 + TEKTRONIX-4110 WYSE-75 + TEKTRONIX-4112 WYSE-85 + TEKTRONIX-4113 XEROX-1720 + TEKTRONIX-4114 XTERM + TEKTRONIX-4115 ZENITH-H19 + TEKTRONIX-4125 ZENITH-Z29 + TEKTRONIX-4404 ZENTEC-30 + TELERAY-1061 + TELERAY-3700 + TELERAY-3800 + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 64] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + DOCUMENTS + + + [1] Anderson, B., "TACACS User Identification Telnet Option", + RFC-927, BBN, December 1984. + + [2] BBN, "Specifications for the Interconnection of a Host and an + IMP", Report 1822, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, + Massachusetts, revised, December 1981. + + [3] BBN, "User Manual for TAC User Database Tool", Bolt Beranek + and Newman, September 1984. + + [4] Ben-Artzi, Amatzia, "Network Management for TCP/IP Network: An + Overview", 3Com, May 1988. + + [5] Bennett, C., "A Simple NIFTP-Based Mail System", IEN 169, + University College, London, January 1981. + + [6] Bhushan, A., "A Report on the Survey Project", RFC-530, + NIC 17375, June 1973. + + [7] Bisbey, R., D. Hollingworth, and B. Britt, "Graphics Language + (version 2.1)", ISI/TM-80-18, Information Sciences Institute, + July 1980. + + [8] Boggs, D., J. Shoch, E. Taft, and R. Metcalfe, "PUP: An + Internetwork Architecture", XEROX Palo Alto Research Center, + CSL-79-10, July 1979; also in IEEE Transactions on + Communication, Volume COM-28, Number 4, April 1980. + + [9] Borman, D., Editor, "Telnet Linemode Option", + RFC 1116, Cray Research, Inc., August 1989. + + [10] Braden, R., "NETRJS Protocol", RFC-740, NIC 42423, + Information Sciences Institute, November 1977. + + [11] Braden, R., and J. Postel, "Requirements for Internet + Gateways", RFC-1009, Obsoletes RFC-985, Information Sciences + Institute, June 1987. + + [12] Bressler, B., "Remote Job Entry Protocol", RFC-407, + NIC 12112, October 1972. + + [13] Bressler, R., "Inter-Entity Communication -- An Experiment", + RFC-441, NIC 13773, January 1973. + + [14] Butler, M., J. Postel, D. Chase, J. Goldberger, and + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 65] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + J. K. Reynolds, "Post Office Protocol - Version 2", RFC-937, + Information Sciences Institute, February 1985. + + [15] Case, J., M. Fedor, M. Schoffstall, and C. Davin, + "A Simple Network Management Protocol", RFC-1098, + (Obsoletes RFC-1067), University of Tennessee at + Knoxville, NYSERNet, Inc., Rensselaer Polytechnic + Institute, and MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, + April 1989. + + [16] Cass, D., and M. Rose, "ISO Transport Services on Top of + the TCP", RFC-983, NTRC, April 1986. + + [17] Cheriton, D., "VMTP: Versatile Message Transaction + Protocol Specification", RFC-1045, pgs 103 & 104, + Stanford University, February 1988. + + [18] Cisco Systems, "Gateway Server Reference Manual", Manual + Revision B, January 10, 1988. + + [19] Clark, D., "PCMAIL: A Distributed Mail System for Personal + Computers", RFC-984, MIT, May 1986. + + [20] Clark, D., M. Lambert, and L. Zhang, "NETBLT: A Bulk Data + Transfer Protocol", RFC-969, MIT Laboratory for Computer + Science, December 1985. + + [21] Cohen, D., "On Holy Wars and a Plea for Peace", IEEE Computer + Magazine, October 1981. + + [22] Cohen, D., "Specifications for the Network Voice Protocol", + RFC-741, ISI/RR 7539, Information Sciences Institute, + March 1976. + + [23] Cohen, D. and J. Postel, "Multiplexing Protocol", IEN 90, + Information Sciences Institute, May 1979. + + [24] COMPASS, "Semi-Annual Technical Report", CADD-7603-0411, + Massachusetts Computer Associates, 4 March 1976. Also as, + "National Software Works, Status Report No. 1," + RADC-TR-76-276, Volume 1, September 1976. And COMPASS. "Second + Semi-Annual Report," CADD-7608-1611, Massachusetts Computer + Associates, August 1976. + + [25] Crispin, M., "Telnet Logout Option", Stanford University-AI, + RFC-727, April 1977. + + [26] Crispin, M., "Telnet SUPDUP Option", Stanford University-AI, + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 66] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + RFC-736, October 1977. + + [27] Crispin, M., "SUPDUP Protocol", RFC-734, NIC 41953, + October 1977. + + [28] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Carriage-Return Disposition + Option", RFC-652, October 1974. + + [29] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Formfeed Disposition Option", + RFC-655, October 1974. + + [30] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Linefeed Disposition", RFC-658, + October 1974. + + [31] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Horizontal Tab Disposition + Option", RFC-654, October 1974. + + [32] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Horizontal Tabstops Option", + RFC-653, October 1974. + + [33] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Vertical Tab Disposition Option", + RFC-657, October 1974. + + [34] Crocker, D., "Telnet Output Vertical Tabstops Option", + RFC-656, October 1974. + + [35] Crocker, D. and R. Gumpertz, "Revised Telnet Byte Marco + Option", RFC-735, November 1977. + + [36] Croft, B., and J. Gilmore, "BOOTSTRAP Protocol (BOOTP)", + RFC-951, Stanford and SUN Microsytems, September 1985. + + [37] Davin, J., J. Case, M. Fedor, and M. Schoffstall, "A Simple + Gateway Monitoring Protocol", RFC-1028, November 1987. + + [38] Day, J., "Telnet Data Entry Terminal Option", RFC-732, + September 1977. + + [39] DCA, "3270 Display System Protocol", #1981-08. + + [40] DDN Protocol Handbook, "Telnet Output Line Width Option", + NIC 50005, December 1985. + + [41] DDN Protocol Handbook, "Telnet Output Page Size Option", + NIC 50005, December 1985. + + [42] DDN Protocol Handbook, "Telnet Reconnection Option", + NIC 50005, December 1985. + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 67] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [43] Deering, S., "Host Extensions for IP Multicasting", + RFC-1112, Obsoletes RFC-988, RFC-1054, Stanford University, + August 1989. + + [44] Elvy, M., and R. Nedved, "Network Mail Path Service", RFC-915, + Harvard and CMU, July 1986. + + [45] Feinler, E., editor, "DDN Protocol Handbook", Network + Information Center, SRI International, December 1985. + + [46] Feinler, E., editor, "Internet Protocol Transition Workbook", + Network Information Center, SRI International, March 1982. + + [47] Feinler, E. and J. Postel, eds., "ARPANET Protocol Handbook", + NIC 7104, for the Defense Communications Agency by SRI + International, Menlo Park, California, Revised January 1978. + + [48] Finlayson, R., T. Mann, J. Mogul, and M. Theimer, "A Reverse + Address Resolution Protocol", RFC-903, Stanford University, + June 1984. + + [49] Forgie, J., "ST - A Proposed Internet Stream Protocol", + IEN 119, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, September 1979. + + [50] Forsdick, H., "CFTP", Network Message, Bolt Beranek and + Newman, January 1982. + + [51] Greenberg, B., "Telnet SUPDUP-OUTPUT Option", RFC-749, + MIT-Multics, September 1978. + + [52] Harrenstien, K., "Name/Finger", RFC-742, NIC 42758, + SRI International, December 1977. + + [53] Harrenstien, K., M. Stahl, and E. Feinler, "DOD Internet Host + Table Specification", RFC-952, Obsoletes RFC-810, + October 1985. + + [54] Harrenstien, K., V. White, and E. Feinler, "Hostnames Server", + RFC-811, SRI International, March 1982. + + [55] Harrenstien, K., and V. White, "Nicname/Whois", RFC-812, + SRI International, March 1982. + + [56] Haverty, J., "XNET Formats for Internet Protocol Version 4", + IEN 158, October 1980. + + [57] Hedrick, C., "Telnet Terminal Speed Option", RFC-1079, + Rutgers University, December 1988. + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 68] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [58] Hedrick, C., "Telnet Remote Flow Control Option", + RFC-1080, Rutgers University, December 1988. + + [59] Hinden, R., "A Host Monitoring Protocol", RFC-869, + Bolt Beranek and Newman, December 1983. + + [60] Hinden, R., and A. Sheltzer, "The DARPA Internet Gateway", + RFC-823, September 1982. + + [61] Hornig, C., "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams + over Ethernet Networks, RFC-894, Symbolics, April 1984. + + [62] Internet Activities Board, J. Postel, Editor, "IAB Official + Protocol Standards", RFC-1130, Internet Activities + October 1989. + + [63] International Standards Organization, "ISO Transport Protocol + Specification - ISO DP 8073", RFC-905, April 1984. + + [64] International Standards Organization, "Protocol for Providing + the Connectionless-Mode Network Services", RFC-926, ISO, + December 1984. + + [65] Kantor, B., and P. Lapsley, "Network News Transfer Protocol", + RFC-977, UC San Diego & UC Berkeley, February 1986. + + [66] Kent, S., and J. Linn, "Privacy Enhancement for Internet + Electronic Mail: Part II -- Certificate-Based Key Management", + BBNCC and DEC, August 1989. + + [67] Khanna, A., and A. Malis, "The ARPANET AHIP-E Host Access + Protocol (Enhanced AHIP)", RFC-1005, BBN Communications + Corporation, May 1987. + + [68] Killian, E., "Telnet Send-Location Option", RFC-779, + April 1981. + + [69] Korb, J., "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams + Over Public Data Networks", RFC-877, Purdue University, + September 1983. + + [70] Levy, S., and T. Jacobson, "Telnet X.3 PAD Option", RFC-1053, + Minnesota Supercomputer Center, April 1988. + + [71] Linn, J., "Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic + Mail: Part I: Message Encipherment and Authentication + Procedures", RFC-1113, Obsoletes RFC-989 and RFC-1040, DEC, + August 1989. + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 69] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [72] Linn, J., "Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic + Mail: Part III -- Algorithms, Modes, and Identifiers", + RFC-1115, DEC, August 1989. + + [73] Lottor, M., "Simple File Transfer Protocol", RFC-913, MIT, + September 1984. + + [74] M/A-COM Government Systems, "Dissimilar Gateway Protocol + Specification, Draft Version", Contract no. CS901145, + November 16, 1987. + + [75] Marcy, G., "Telnet X Display Location Option", RFC-1096, + Carnegie Mellon University, March 1989. + + [76] Malis, A., "Logical Addressing Implementation Specification", + BBN Report 5256, pp 31-36, May 1983. + + [77] Malkin, G., "KNET/VM Command Message Protocol Functional + Overview", Spartacus, Inc., January 4, 1988. + + [78] Metcalfe, R. M. and D. R. Boggs, "Ethernet: Distributed Packet + Switching for Local Computer Networks", Communications of the + ACM, 19 (7), pp 395-402, July 1976. + + [79] Miller, T., "Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol", RFC-938, + ACC, February 1985. + + [80] Mills, D., "Network Time Protocol (Version 1), Specification + and Implementation", RFC-1059, University of Delaware, + July 1988. + + [81] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Concepts and + Facilities", RFC-1034, Obsoletes RFCs 882, 883, and + 973, Information Sciences Institute, November 1987. + + [82] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Implementation and + Specification", RFC-1035, Obsoletes RFCs 882, 883, and + 973, Information Sciences Institute, November 1987. + + [83] Moy, J., "The OSPF Specification", RFC 1131, Proteon, + October 1989. + + [84] Nedved, R., "Telnet Terminal Location Number Option", RFC-946, + Carnegie-Mellon University, May 1985. + + [85] NSW Protocol Committee, "MSG: The Interprocess Communication + Facility for the National Software Works", CADD-7612-2411, + Massachusetts Computer Associates, BBN 3237, Bolt Beranek and + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 70] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + Newman, Revised December 1976. + + [86] Onions, J., and M. Rose, "ISO-TP0 bridge between TCP + and X.25", RFC-1086, Nottingham, TWG, December 1988. + + [87] Partridge, C. and G. Trewitt, The High-Level Entity Management + System (HEMS), RFCs 1021, 1022, 1023, and 1024, BBN/NNSC, + Stanford, October, 1987. + + [88] Plummer, D., "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol or + Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48-bit Ethernet + Addresses for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", RFC-826, + MIT-LCS, November 1982. + + [89] Postel, J., "Active Users", RFC-866, Information + Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [90] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "A Standard for the Transmission + of IP Datagrams over IEEE 802 Networks", RFC-1042, + USC/Information Sciences Institute, February 1988. + + [91] Postel, J., "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams + over Experimental Ethernet Networks, RFC-895, Information + Sciences Institute, April 1984. + + [92] Postel, J., "Character Generator Protocol", RFC-864, + Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [93] Postel, J., "Daytime Protocol", RFC-867, Information Sciences + Institute, May 1983. + + [94] Postel, J., "Discard Protocol", RFC-863, Information Sciences + Institute, May 1983. + + [95] Postel, J., "Echo Protocol", RFC-862, Information Sciences + Institute, May 1983. + + [96] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol", RFC-959, + Information Sciences Institute, October 1985. + + [97] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol - DARPA + Internet Program Protocol Specification", RFC-792, + Information Sciences Institute, September 1981. + + [98] Postel, J., "Internet Message Protocol", RFC-759, IEN 113, + Information Sciences Institute, August 1980. + + [99] Postel, J., "Name Server", IEN 116, Information Sciences + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 71] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + Institute, August 1979. + + [100] Postel, J., "Quote of the Day Protocol", RFC-865, + Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [101] Postel, J., "Remote Telnet Service", RFC-818, + Information Sciences Institute, November 1982. + + [102] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC-821, + Information Sciences Institute, August 1982. + + [103] Postel, J., "Telnet End of Record Option", RFC-885, + Information Sciences Institute, December 1983. + + [104] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", RFC-768 + Information Sciences Institute, August 1980. + + [105] Postel, J., ed., "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program + Protocol Specification", RFC-791, Information Sciences + Institute, September 1981. + + [106] Postel, J., ed., "Transmission Control Protocol - DARPA + Internet Program Protocol Specification", RFC-793, + Information Sciences Institute, September 1981. + + [107] Postel, J. and D. Crocker, "Remote Controlled Transmission and + Echoing Telnet Option", RFC-726, March 1977. + + [108] Postel, J., and K. Harrenstien, "Time Protocol", RFC-868, + Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [109] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Extended Options - List + Option", RFC-861, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [110] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Binary Transmission", + RFC-856, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [111] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Echo Option", RFC-857, + Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [112] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification", + RFC-854, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [113] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Status Option", RFC-859, + Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [114] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Suppress Go Ahead Option", + RFC-858, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 72] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [115] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Timing Mark Option", + RFC-860, Information Sciences Institute, May 1983. + + [116] Rekhter, J., "Telnet 3270 Regime Option", RFC-1041, + IBM, January 1988. + + [117] Reynolds, J., "BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions", + RFC 1084, Information Sciences Institute, December 1988. + + [118] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Official Internet Protocols", + RFC-1011, USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1987. + + [119] Romano, S., M. Stahl, and M. Recker, "Internet Numbers", + RFC-1117, SRI-NIC, August 1989. + + [120] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of + Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets", RFC-1065, + TWG, August 1988. + + [121] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Management Information Base for + Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", RFC-1066, + TWG, August 1988. + + [122] Rose, M., "Post Office Protocol - Version 3", RFC-1081, + TWG, November 1988. + + [123] Seamonson, L. J., and E. C. Rosen, "STUB" Exterior Gateway + Protocol", RFC-888, BBN Communications Corporation, + January 1984. + + [124] Shuttleworth, B., "A Documentary of MFENet, a National + Computer Network", UCRL-52317, Lawrence Livermore Labs, + Livermore, California, June 1977. + + [125] Silverman, S., "Output Marking Telnet Option", RFC-933, MITRE, + January 1985. + + [126] Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)", RFC-783, + MIT/LCS, June 1981. + + [127] Solomon, M., L. Landweber, and D. Neuhengen, "The CSNET Name + Server", Computer Networks, v.6, n.3, pp. 161-172, July 1982. + + [128] Solomon, M., and E. Wimmers, "Telnet Terminal Type Option", + RFC-930, Supercedes RFC-884, University of Wisconsin, Madison, + January 1985. + + [129] Sproull, R., and E. Thomas, "A Networks Graphics Protocol", + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 73] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + NIC 24308, August 1974. + + [130] St. Johns, M., "Authentication Service", RFC-931, TPSC, + January 1985. + + [131] Tappan, D., "The CRONUS Virtual Local Network", RFC-824, + Bolt Beranek and Newman, August 1982. + + [132] Taylor, J., "ERPC Functional Specification", Version 1.04, + HYDRA Computer Systems, Inc., July 1984. + + [133] "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network: Data Link Layer and + Physical Layer Specification", AA-K759B-TK, Digital Equipment + Corporation, Maynard, MA. Also as: "The Ethernet - A Local + Area Network", Version 1.0, Digital Equipment Corporation, + Intel Corporation, Xerox Corporation, September 1980. And: + "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network: Data Link Layer and + Physical Layer Specifications", Digital, Intel and Xerox, + November 1982. And: XEROX, "The Ethernet, A Local Area + Network: Data Link Layer and Physical Layer Specification", + X3T51/80-50, Xerox Corporation, Stamford, CT., October 1980. + + [134] The High Level Protocol Group, "A Network Independent File + Transfer Protocol", INWG Protocol Note 86, December 1977. + + [135] Thomas, Bob, "The Interhost Protocol to Support CRONUS/DIAMOND + Interprocess Communication", BBN, September 1983. + + [136] Tovar, "Telnet Extended ASCII Option", RFC-698, Stanford + University-AI, July 1975. + + [137] Uttal, J., J. Rothschild, and C. Kline, "Transparent + Integration of UNIX and MS-DOS", Locus Computing Corporation. + + [138] Velten, D., R. Hinden, and J. Sax, "Reliable Data Protocol", + RFC-908, BBN Communications Corporation, July 1984. + + [139] Waitzman, D., "Telnet Window Size Option", RFC-1073, + BBN STC, October, 1988. + + [140] Waitzman, D., C. Partridge, and S. Deering + "Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol", RFC-1075, + BBN STC and Stanford University, November 1988. + + [141] Wancho, F., "Password Generator Protocol", RFC-972, WSMR, + January 1986. + + [142] Warrier, U., and L. Besaw, "The Common Management + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 74] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + Information Services and Protocol over TCP/IP (CMOT)", + RFC-1095, Unisys Corp. and Hewlett-Packard, April 1989. + + [143] Welch, B., "The Sprite Remote Procedure Call System", + Technical Report, UCB/Computer Science Dept., 86/302, + University of California at Berkeley, June 1986. + + [144] Xerox, "Courier: The Remote Procedure Protocol", XSIS 038112, + December 1981. + + [145] Yasuda, A., and T. Thompson, "TELNET Data Entry Terminal + Option DODIIS Implementation", RFC-1043, DIA, February 1988. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 75] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + PEOPLE + + + [AB20] Art Berggreen ACC art@SALT.ACC.ARPA + + [ABB2] A. Blasco Bonito CNUCE blasco@ICNUCEVM.CNUCE.CNR.IT + + [AD14] Annette DeSchon ISI DESCHON@ISI.EDU + + [AGM] Andy Malis BBN Malis@BBN.COM + + [AKH5] Arthur Hartwig UQNET + munnari!wombat.decnet.uq.oz.au!ccarthur@UUNET.UU.NET + + [ANM2] April N. Marine SRI APRIL@NIC.DDN.MIL + + [AW90] Amanda Walker Intercon AMANDA@INTERCON.COM + + [AXB] Albert G. Broscius UPENN broscius@DSL.CIS.UPENN.EDU + + [AXB1] Amatzia Ben-Artzi ---none--- + + [AXC] Andrew Cherenson SGI arc@SGI.COM + + [AXC1] Anthony Chung Sytek + sytek!syteka!anthony@HPLABS.HP.COM + + [AXC2] Asheem Chandna AT&T ac0@mtuxo.att.com + + [AXM] Alex Martin Retix ---none--- + + [AXS] Arthur Salazar Locus lcc.arthur@SEAS.UCLA.EDU + + [BA4] Brian Anderson BBN baanders@CCQ.BBN.COM + + [BB257] Brian W. Brown SynOptics BBROWN@MVIS1.SYNOPTICS.COM + + [BCH2] Barry Howard LLL Howard@NMFECC.ARPA + + [BCN] Clifford B. Newman UWASH bcn@CS.WASHINGTON.EDU + + [BD70] Bernd Doleschal SEL Doleschal@A.ISI.EDU + + [BH144] Bridget Halsey Banyan bah@BANYAN.BANYAN.COM + + [BJR2] Bill Russell NYU russell@cmcl2.NYU.EDU + + [BKR] Brian Reid DEC reid@DECWRL.DEC.COM + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 76] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [BP52] Brad Parker CAYMAN brad@cayman.Cayman.COM + + [BS221] Bob Stewart Xyplex STEWART@XYPLEX.COM + + [BWB6] Barry Boehm DARPA boehm@DARPA.MIL + + [BXA] Bill Anderson MITRE wda@MITRE-BEDFORD.ORG + + [BXB] Brad Benson Touch ---none--- + + [BXE] Brian A. Ehrmantraut Auspex Systems bae@auspex.com + + [BXH] Brian Horn Locus ---none--- + + [BXL] Brian Lloyd SIRIUS ---none--- + + [BXN] Bill Norton Merit wbn@MERIT.EDU + + [BXV] Bill Versteeg NRC bvs@NRC.COM + + [BXW] Brent Welch Sprite + brent%sprite.berkeley.edu@GINGER.BERKELEY.EDU + + [BXW1] Bruce Willins Raycom ---none--- + + [BXZ] Bob Zaniolo Reuter ---none--- + + [CLH3] Charles Hedrick RUTGERS HEDRICK@ARAMIS.RUTGERS.EDU + + [CMR] Craig Rogers ISI Rogers@ISI.EDU + + [CXM] Charles Marker II MIPS marker@MIPS.COM + + [CXT] Christopher Tengi Princeton tengi@Princeton.EDU + + [DAG4] David A. Gomberg MITRE gomberg@GATEWAY.MITRE.ORG + + [DB14] Dave Borman Cray dab@CRAY.COM + + [DC126] Dick Cogger Cornell rhx@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU + + [DCP1] David Plummer MIT DCP@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA + + [DDC1] David Clark MIT ddc@LCS.MIT.EDU + + [DJK13] David Kaufman DeskTalk ---none--- + + [DLM1] David Mills LINKABIT Mills@HUEY.UDEL.EDU + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 77] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [DM28] Dennis Morris DCA Morrisd@IMO-UVAX.DCA.MIL + + [DM280] Dave Mackie NCD lupine!djm@UUNET.UU.NET + + [DM354] Don McWilliam UBC mcwillm@CC.UBC.CA + + [DPR] David Reed MIT-LCS Reed@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA + + [DRC3] Dave Cheriton STANFORD + cheriton@PESCADERO.STANFORD.EDU + + [DT15] Daniel Tappan BBN Tappan@BBN.COM + + [DW181] David Wolfe SRI ctabka@TSCA.ISTC.SRI.COM + + [DW183] David Waitzman BBN dwaitzman@BBN.COM + + [DXB] Dave Buehmann Intergraph ingr!daveb@UUNET.UU.NET + + [DXD] Dennis J.W. Dube VIA SYSTEMS ---none--- + + [DXG] David Goldberg SMI sun!dg@UCBARPA.BERKELEY.EDU + + [DXK] Doug Karl OSU + KARL-D@OSU-20.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU + + [DXM] Didier Moretti Ungermann-Bass ---none--- + + [DXM1] Donna McMalster David Systems ---none--- + + [DXP] Dave Preston CMC ---none--- + + [DY26] Dennis Yaro SUN yaro@SUN.COM + + [EAK4] Earl Killian LLL EAK@MORDOR.S1.GOV + + [EBM] Eliot Moss MIT EBM@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU + + [EP53] Eric Peterson Locus lcc.eric@SEAS.UCLA.EDU + + [EXC] Ed Cain DCA cain@edn-unix.dca.mil + + [EXR] Eric Rubin FiberCom err@FIBERCOM.COM + + [EXR1] Efrat Ramati Lannet Co. ---none--- + + [FB77] Fred Baker Vitalink baker%vitam6@UUNET.UU.NET + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 78] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [FJK2] Frank Kastenholz Interlan KASTEN@MITVMA.MIT.EDU + + [FJW] Frank J. Wancho WSMR WANCHO@SIMTEL20.ARPA + + [FXB1] Felix Burton DIAB FB@DIAB.SE + + [GAL5] Guillermo A. Loyola IBM LOYOLA@IBM.COM + + [GB7] Gerd Beling FGAN GBELING@ISI.EDU + + [GEOF] Geoff Goodfellow OSD Geoff@FERNWOOD.MPK.CA.US + + [GGB2] Geoff Baehr SUN geoffb@ENG.SUN.COM + + [GM23] Glenn Marcy CMU Glenn.Marcy@A.CS.CMU.EDU + + [GS2] Greg Satz cisco satz@CISCO.COM + + [GS123] Geof Stone NSC geof@NETWORK.COM + + [GSM11] Gary S. Malkin Proteon gmalkin@PROTEON.COM + + [GXG] Gil Greebaum Unisys gcole@nisd.cam.unisys.com + + [GXP] Gill Pratt MIT gill%mit-ccc@MC.LCS.MIT.EDU + + [GXS] Guenther Schreiner LINK + guenther%ira.uka.de@RELAY.CS.NET + + [GXT] Glenn Trewitt STANFORD trewitt@AMADEUS.STANFORD.EDU + + [GXT1] Gene Tsudik USC tsudik@USC.EDU + + [GXW] Glenn Waters Bell Northern gwaters@BNR.CA + + [HCF2] Harry Forsdick BBN Forsdick@BBN.COM + + [HS23] Hokey Stenn Plus5 hokey@PLUS5.COM + + [HWB] Hans-Werner Braun MICHIGAN HWB@MCR.UMICH.EDU + + [HXE] Hunaid Engineer Cray hunaid@OPUS.CRAY.COM + + [HXK] Henry Kaijak Gandalf ---none--- + + [IEEE] Vince Condello IEEE ---none--- + + [JAG] James Gosling SUN JAG@SUN.COM + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 79] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [JB478] Jonathan Biggar Netlabs jon@netlabs.com + + [JBP] Jon Postel ISI Postel@ISI.EDU + + [JBW1] Joseph Walters, Jr. BBN JWalters@BBN.COM + + [JCB1] John Burruss BBN JBurruss@VAX.BBN.COM + + [JCM48] Jeff Mogul DEC mogul@DECWRL.DEC.COM + + [JD21] Jonathan Dreyer BBN Dreyer@CCV.BBN.COM + + [JDC20] Jeffrey Case UTK case@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU + + [JFH2] Jack Haverty BBN JHaverty@BBN.COM + + [JFW] Jon F. Wilkes STC Wilkes@CCINT1.RSRE.MOD.UK + + [JGH] Jim Herman BBN Herman@CCJ.BBN.COM + + [JJB25] John Bowe BBN jbowe@PINEAPPLE.BBN.COM + + [JKR1] Joyce K. Reynolds ISI JKRey@ISI.EDU + + [JR35] Jon Rochlis MIT jon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU + + [JRL3] John LoVerso Xylogics loverso@XYLOGICS.COM + + [JS28] John A. Shriver Proteon jas@PROTEON.COM + + [JTM4] John Moy Proteon jmoy@PROTEON.COM + + [JWF] Jim Forgie MIT/LL FORGIE@XN.LL.MIT.EDU + + [JXB] Jeffrey Buffun Apollo jbuffum@APOLLO.COM + + [JXC] John Cook Chipcom cook@chipcom.com + + [JXE2] Jeanne Evans UKMOD JME%RSRE.MOD.UK@CS.UCL.AC.UK + + [JXF] Josh Fielk Optical Data Systems ---none--- + + [JXG] Jerry Geisler Boeing ---none--- + + [JXG1] Jim Greuel HP jimg%hpcndpc@hplabs.hp.com + + [JXH] Jeff Honig Cornell jch@sonne.tn.cornell.edu + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 80] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [JXH1] Jim Hayes Apple Hayes@APPLE.COM + + [JXI] Jon Infante ICL ---none--- + + [JXM] Joseph Murdock Network Resources Corporation + ---none--- + + [JXO] Jack O'Neil ENCORE ---none--- + + [JXO1] Jerrilynn Okamura Ontologic ---none--- + + [JXO2] Jarkko Oikarinen Tolsun jto@TOLSUN.OULU.FI + + [JXP] Joe Pato Apollo apollo!pato@EDDIE.MIT.EDU + + [JXR] Jacob Rekhter IBM Yakov@IBM.COM + + [JXS] Jim Stevens Rockwell Stevens@ISI.EDU + + [JXS1] John Sancho CastleRock ---none--- + + [KAA] Ken Adelman TGV, Inc. Adelman@TGV.COM + + [KA4] Karl Auerbach Epilogue auerbach@csl.sri.com + + [KH43] Kathy Huber BBN khuber@bbn.com + + [KLH] Ken Harrenstien SRI KLH@NIC.DDN.MIL + + [KR35] Keith Reynolds SCO keithr@SCO.COM + + [KSL] Kirk Lougheed cisco LOUGHEED@MATHOM.CISCO.COM + + [KXD] Kevin DeVault NI ---none--- + + [KXS] Keith Sklower Berkeley sklower@okeeffe.berkeley.edu + + [KXW] Ken Whitfield MCNC ken@MCNC.ORG + + [KZM] Keith McCloghrie TWG kzm@TWG.ARPA + + [LL69] Lawrence Lebahn DIA DIA3@PAXRV-NES.NAVY.MIL + + [LLP] Larry Peterson ARIZONA llp@ARIZONA.EDU + + [LXE] Len Edmondson SUN len@TOPS.SUN.COM + + [LXF] Larry Fischer DSS lfischer@dss.com + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 81] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [LXH] Leo Hourvitz NeXt leo@NEXT.COM + + [MA] Mike Accetta CMU MIKE.ACCETTA@CMU-CS-A.EDU + + [MARY] Mary K. Stahl SRI Stahl@NIC.DDN.MIL + + [MAR10] Mark A. Rosenstein MIT mar@ATHENA.MIT.EDU + + [MB] Michael Brescia BBN Brescia@CCV.BBN.COM + + [MBG] Michael Greenwald SYMBOLICS + Greenwald@SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA + + [MCSJ] Mike StJohns TPSC StJohns@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA + + [ME38] Marc A. Elvy Marble ELVY@CARRARA.MARBLE.COM + + [MKL] Mark Lottor SRI MKL@NIC.DDN.MIL + + [ML109] Mike Little MACOM little@MACOM4.ARPA + + [MLS34] L. Michael Sabo TMAC darth!eniac!sabo@Sun.Com + + [MO2] Michael O'Brien AEROSPACE obrien@AEROSPACE.AERO.ORG + + [MRC] Mark Crispin Simtel MRC@SIMTEL20.ARPA + + [MS9] Marty Schoffstahl Nysernet schoff@NISC.NYSER.NET + + [MS56] Marvin Solomon WISC solomon@CS.WISC.EDU + + [MXB] Mike Berrow Relational Technology ---none--- + + [MXB1] Mike Burrows DEC burrows@SRC.DEC.COM + + [MXL] Mark L. Lambert MIT markl@PTT.LCS.MIT.EDU + + [MXP] Martin Picard Oracle ---none--- + + [MXS] Mike Spina Prime + WIZARD%enr.prime.com@RELAY.CS.NET + + [MXW] Michael Waters EON ---none--- + + [NC3] J. Noel Chiappa MIT JNC@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU + + [NT12] Neil Todd IST + mcvax!ist.co.uk!neil@UUNET.UU.NET + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 82] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [PAM6] Paul McNabb RICE pam@PURDUE.EDU + + [PCW] C. Philip Wood LANL cpw@LANL.GOV + + [PD39] Pete Delaney ECRC + pete%ecrcvax@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA + + [PHD1] Pieter Ditmars BBN pditmars@BBN.COM + + [PK] Peter Kirstein UCL Kirstein@NSS.CS.UCL.AC.UK + + [PL4] Phil Lapsley BERKELEY phil@UCBARPA.BERKELEY.EDU + + [PM1] Paul Mockapetris ISI PVM@ISI.EDU + + [PXK] Philip Koch Dartmouth Philip.Koch@DARTMOUTH.EDU + + [RAM57] Rex Mann CDC ---none--- + + [RDXS] R. Dwight Schettler HP rds%hpcndm@HPLABS.HP.COM + + [RH6] Robert Hinden BBN Hinden@CCV.BBN.COM + + [RHT] Robert Thomas BBN BThomas@F.BBN.COM + + [RN6] Rudy Nedved CMU Rudy.Nedved@CMU-CS-A.EDU + + [RTB3] Bob Braden ISI Braden@ISI.EDU + + [RWS4] Robert W. Scheifler ARGUS RWS@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU + + [RXB] Ramesh Babu Excelan + mtxinu!excelan!ramesh@UCBVAX.BERKELEY.EDU + + [RXB1] Ron Bhanukitsiri DEC rbhank@DECVAX.DEC.COM + + [RXC] Rob Chandhok CMU chandhok@gnome.cs.cmu.edu + + [RXC1] Rick Carlos TI rick.ticipa.csc.ti.com + + [RXD] Roger Dev Cabletron ---none--- + + [RXD1] Ralph Droms NRI rdroms@NRI.RESTON.VA.US + + [RXH] Reijane Huai Cheyenne sibal@CSD2.NYU.EDU + + [RXJ] Ronald Jacoby SGI rj@SGI.COM + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 83] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [RXM] Robert Myhill BBN Myhill@CCS.BBN.COM + + [RXN] Rina Nethaniel RND ---none--- + + [RXS] Ron Strich SSDS ---none--- + + [RXT] Ron Thornton GenRad thornton@qm7501.genrad.com + + [RXZ] Rayan Zachariassen Toronto rayan@AI.TORONTO.EDU + + [SA1] Sten Andler IBM + andler.ibm-sj@RAND-RELAY.ARPA + + [SAF3] Stuart A. Friedberg UWISC stuart@CS.WISC.EDU + + [SB98] Stan Barber BCM SOB@BCM.TMC.EDU + + [SC3] Steve Casner ISI Casner@ISI.EDU + + [SGC] Steve Chipman BBN Chipman@F.BBN.COM + + [SHB] Steven Blumenthal BBN BLUMENTHAL@VAX.BBN.COM + + [SH37] Sergio Heker JVNC heker@JVNCC.CSC.ORG + + [SL70] Stuart Levy UMN slevy@UC.MSC.UMN.EDU + + [SRN1] Stephen Northcutt NSWC SNORTHC@RELAY-NSWC.NAVY.MIL + + [SS92] Steve Schoch NASA SCHOCH@AMES.ARC.NASA.GOV + + [SXA] Susie Armstrong XEROX Armstrong.wbst128@XEROX.COM + + [SXB] Scott Bellows Purdue smb@cs.purdue.edu + + [SXC] Steve Conklin Intergraph tesla!steve@ingr.com + + [SXD] Steve Deering Stanford deering@PECASERO.STANFORD.EDU + + [SXH] Steven Hunter LLNL hunter@CCC.MFECC.LLNL.GOV + + [SXK] Skip Koppenhaver DAC stubby!skip@uunet.UU.NET + + [SXL] Sam Lau Pirelli/Focom ---none--- + + [SXP] Sanand Patel Canstar sanand@HUB.TORONTO.EDU + + [SXS] Steve Silverman MITRE Blankert@MITRE-GATEWAY.ORG + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 84] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [SXS1] Susie Snitzer Britton-Lee ---none--- + + [SXW] Steve Waldbusser CMU sw01+@andrew.cmu.edu + + [TB6] Todd Baker 3COM tzb@BRIDGE2.3COM.COM + + [TC27] Thomas Calderwood BBN TCALDERW@BBN.COM + + [TN] Thomas Narten Purdue narten@PURDUE.EDU + + [TU] Tom Unger UMich tom@CITI.UMICH.EDU + + [TXM] Trudy Miller ACC Trudy@ACC.ARPA + + [TXR] Tim Rylance Praxis praxis!tkr@UUNET.UU.NET + + [TXS] Ted J. Socolofsky Spider Teds@SPIDER.CO.UK + + [UB3] Ulf Bilting CHALMERS bilting@PURDUE.EDU + + [UW2] Unni Warrier Netlabs unni@NETLABS.COM + + [VXS] Vinod Singh Unify ---none--- + + [VXT] V. Taylor CANADA vktaylor@NCS.DND.CA + + [WDW11] William D. Wisner wisner@HAYES.FAI.ALASKA.EDU + + [WJC2] Bill Croft STANFORD Croft@SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU + + [WJS1] Weldon J. Showalter DCA Gamma@EDN-UNIX.ARPA + + [WLB8] William L. Biagi Advintech + CSS002.BLBIAGI@ADVINTECH-MVS.ARPA + + [WM3] William Melohn SUN Melohn@SUN.COM + + [WXS] Wayne Schroeder SDSC schroeder@SDS.SDSC.EDU + + [VXW] Val Wilson Spider + cvax!spider.co.uk!val@uunet.UU.NET + + [YXK] Yoav Kluger Spartacus ykluger@HAWK.ULOWELL.EDU + + [YXW] Y.C. Wang Network Application Technology + ---none--- + + [XEROX] Fonda Pallone Xerox ---none--- + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 85] + +RFC 1060 Assigned Numbers March 1990 + + + [ZSU] Zaw-Sing Su SRI ZSu@TSCA.ISTC.SRI.COM + +Security Considerations + + Security issues are not discussed in this memo. + +Authors' Addresses: + + Joyce K. Reynolds + University of Southern California + Information Sciences Institute + 4676 Admiralty Way + Marina del Rey, CA 90292 + + Phone: (213) 822-1511 + + Email: JKREY@ISI.EDU + + + Jon Postel + University of Southern California + Information Sciences Institute + 4676 Admiralty Way + Marina del Rey, CA 90292 + + Phone: (213) 822-1511 + + Email: POSTEL@ISI.EDU + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Reynolds & Postel [Page 86] +
\ No newline at end of file |