diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1286.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1286.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc1286.txt | 2243 |
1 files changed, 2243 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1286.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1286.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fd7ab08 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1286.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2243 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group E. Decker +Request for Comments: 1286 cisco Systems, Inc. + P. Langille + Digital Equipment Corporation + A. Rijsinghani + Digital Equipment Corporation + K. McCloghrie + Hughes LAN Systems, Inc. + December 1991 + + + Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges + +Status of this Memo + + This memo is an extension to the SNMP MIB. This RFC specifies an IAB + standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests + discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the + current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the + standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of + this memo is unlimited. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Abstract ............................................. 2 + 2. The Network Management Framework...................... 2 + 3. Objects .............................................. 2 + 3.1 Format of Definitions ............................... 3 + 4. Overview ............................................. 3 + 4.1 Structure of MIB .................................... 4 + 4.1.1 The dot1dBase Group ............................... 7 + 4.1.2 The dot1dStp Group ................................ 7 + 4.1.3 The dot1dSr Group ................................. 7 + 4.1.4 The dot1dTp Group ................................. 7 + 4.1.5 The dot1dStatic Group ............................. 7 + 4.2 Relationship to Other MIBs .......................... 7 + 4.2.1 Relationship to the 'system' group ................ 8 + 4.2.2 Relationship to the 'interfaces' group ............ 8 + 4.3 Textual Conventions ................................. 9 + 5. Definitions .......................................... 9 + 5.1 Groups in the Bridge MIB ............................ 11 + 5.2 The dot1dBase Group Definitions ..................... 11 + 5.3 The dot1dStp Group Definitions ...................... 14 + 5.4 The dot1dSr Group Definitions ....................... 22 + 5.5 The dot1dTp Group Definitions ....................... 28 + 5.6 The dot1dStatic Group Definitions ................... 34 + 5.8 Traps for use by Bridges ............................ 36 + 6. Acknowledgments ...................................... 37 + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 1] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + 7. References ........................................... 38 + 8. Security Considerations............................... 39 + 9. Authors' Addresses.................................... 40 + +1. Abstract + + This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) + for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets. + In particular it defines objects for managing bridges based on the + IEEE 802.1d draft standard between Local Area Network (LAN) segments. + Provisions are made for support of transparent and source route + bridging. Provisions are also made so that these objects apply to + bridges connected by subnetworks other than LAN segments. + +2. The Network Management Framework + + The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three + components. They are: + + RFC 1155 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for describing + and naming objects for the purpose of management. RFC 1212 + defines a more concise description mechanism, which is wholly + consistent with the SMI. + + RFC 1156 which defines MIB-I, the core set of managed objects for + the Internet suite of protocols. RFC 1213, defines MIB-II, an + evolution of MIB-I based on implementation experience and new + operational requirements. + + RFC 1157 which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for network + access to managed objects. + + The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of + experimentation and evaluation. + +3. Objects + + Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed + the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are + defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [7] + defined in the SMI. In particular, each object has a name, a syntax, + and an encoding. The name is an object identifier, an + administratively assigned name, which specifies an object type. The + object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely + identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human + convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the OBJECT + DESCRIPTOR, to also refer to the object type. + + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 2] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + The syntax of an object type defines the abstract data structure + corresponding to that object type. The ASN.1 language is used for + this purpose. However, the SMI [3] purposely restricts the ASN.1 + constructs which may be used. These restrictions are explicitly made + for simplicity. + + The encoding of an object type is simply how that object type is + represented using the object type's syntax. Implicitly tied to the + notion of an object type's syntax and encoding is how the object type + is represented when being transmitted on the network. + + The SMI specifies the use of the basic encoding rules of ASN.1 [8], + subject to the additional requirements imposed by the SNMP. + +3.1. Format of Definitions + + Section 5 contains the specification of all object types contained in + this MIB module. The object types are defined using the conventions + defined in the SMI, as amended by the extensions specified in [9,10]. + +4. Overview + + A common device present in many networks is the Bridge. This device + is used to connect Local Area Network segments below the network + layer. There are two major modes defined for this bridging; + transparent and source route. The transparent method of bridging is + defined in the draft IEEE 802.1d specification [11]. Source route + bridging has been defined by I.B.M. and is described in the Token + Ring Architecture Reference [12]. IEEE 802.1d is currently working + on combining the source route and transparent techniques in a + compatible fashion. This memo defines those objects needed for the + management of a bridging entity operating in one of these modes. + + To be consistent with IAB directives and good engineering practice, + an explicit attempt was made to keep this MIB as simple as possible. + This was accomplished by applying the following criteria to objects + proposed for inclusion: + + (1) Start with a small set of essential objects and add only + as further objects are needed. + + (2) Require objects be essential for either fault or + configuration management. + + (3) Consider evidence of current use and/or utility. + + (4) Limit the total of objects. + + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 3] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + (5) Exclude objects which are simply derivable from others in + this or other MIBs. + + (6) Avoid causing critical sections to be heavily + instrumented. The guideline that was followed is one + counter per critical section per layer. + +4.1. Structure of MIB + + Objects in this MIB are arranged into groups. Each group is + organized as a set of related objects. The overall structure and + assignment of objects to their groups is shown below. Where + appropriate the corresponding IEEE 802.1d [11] management object name + is also included. + +Bridge MIB Name IEEE 802.1d Name + +dot1dBridge + dot1dBase + BridgeAddress Bridge.BridgeAddress + NumPorts Bridge.NumberOfPorts + Type + PortTable + Port BridgePort.PortNumber + IfIndex + Circuit + DelayExceededDiscards .DiscardTransitDelay + MtuExceededDiscards .DiscardOnError + dot1dStp + ProtocolSpecification + Priority SpanningTreeProtocol + .BridgePriority + TimeSinceTopologyChange .TimeSinceTopologyChange + TopChanges .TopologyChangeCount + DesignatedRoot .DesignatedRoot + RootCost .RootCost + RootPort .RootPort + MaxAge .MaxAge + HelloTime .HelloTime + HoldTime .HoldTime + ForwardDelay .ForwardDelay + BridgeMaxAge .BridgeMaxAge + BridgeHelloTime .BridgeHelloTime + BridgeForwardDelay .BridgeForwardDelay + PortTable + Port SpanningTreeProtocolPort + .PortNumber + Priority .PortPriority + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 4] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + State .SpanningTreeState + Enable + PathCost .PortPathCost + DesignatedRoot .DesignatedRoot + DesignatedCost .DesignatedCost + DesignatedBridge .DesignatedBridge + DesignatedPort .DesignatedPort + ForwardTransitions + + dot1dSr + PortTable + Port + HopCount SourceRoutingPort + .PortHopCount + LocalSegment .SegmentNumber + BridgeNum .BridgeNumber + TargetSegment + LargestFrame .LargestFrameSize + STESpanMode .LimitedBroadcastMode + SpecInFrames BridgePort + .ValidSRFramesReceived + SpecOutFrames .ValidSRForwardedOutbound + ApeInFrames + ApeOutFrames .BroadcastFramesForwarded + SteInFrames + SteOutFrames .BroadcastFramesForwarded + SegmentMismatchDiscards .DiscardInvalidRI + DuplicateSegmentDiscards .LanIdMismatch + HopCountExceededDiscards .FramesDiscardedHopCountExceeded + dot1dTp + LearnedEntryDiscards BridgeFilter.DatabaseSize + .NumDynamic,NumStatic + AgingTime BridgeFilter.AgingTime + FdbTable + Address + Status + Port + PortTable + Port + MaxInfo + InFrames BridgePort.FramesReceived + OutFrames .ForwardOutbound + InDiscards .DiscardInbound + dot1dStatic + StaticTable + Address + ReceivePort + AllowedToGoTo + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 5] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + Status + + The following IEEE 802.1d management objects have not been included + in the Bridge MIB for the indicated reasons. + + +IEEE 802.1d Object Disposition + +Bridge.BridgeName Same as sysDescr (MIB II) +Bridge.BridgeUpTime Same as sysUpTime (MIB II) +Bridge.PortAddresses Same as ifPhysAddress (MIB II) +BridgePort.PortName Same as ifDescr (MIB II) +BridgePort.PortType Same as ifType (MIB II) +BridgePort.RoutingType Derivable from the implemented + groups + +SpanningTreeProtocol + .BridgeIdentifier Combination of dot1dStpPriority + and dot1dBaseBridgeAddress + .TopologyChange Since this is transitory, it + is not considered useful. +SpanningTreeProtocolPort + .Uptime Same as ifLastChange (MIB II) + .PortIdentifier Combination of dot1dStpPortNum + and dot1dStpPortPriority + .TopologyChangeAcknowledged Since this is transitory, it + is not considered useful. + .DiscardLackOfBuffers Redundant + +Transmission Priority These objects are not required + as per the Pics Proforma and + not considered useful. + .TransmissionPriorityName + .OutboundUserPriority + .OutboundAccessPriority + +SourceRoutingPort The Source Routing Supplement, + at the time of this writing, + is not stable. The following + objects were NOT included in + this MIB because they are + redundant or not considered + useful. + .LimitedBroadcastEnable +BridgePort.DupLanIdOrTreeError + .DiscardLackOfBuffers + .DiscardErrorDetails + .DiscardTargetLANInoperable + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 6] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + .ValidSRDiscardedInbound + .BroadcastBytesForwarded + .NonBroadcastBytesForwarded + .FramesNotReceivedDueToCongestion + .FramesDiscardedDueToInternalError + +4.1.1. The dot1dBase Group + + This mandatory group contains the objects which are applicable to all + types of bridges. + +4.1.2. The dot1dStp Group + + This group contains the objects that denote the bridge's state with + respect to the Spanning Tree Protocol. If a node does not + implemented the Spanning Tree Protocol, this group will not be + implemented. This group is applicable to any transparent only, + source route, or SRT bridge which implements the Spanning Tree + Protocol. + +4.1.3. The dot1dSr Group + + This group contains the objects that describe the entity's state with + respect to source route bridging. If source routing is not supported + this group will not be implemented. This group is applicable to + source route only, and SRT bridges. + +4.1.4. The dot1dTp Group + + This group contains objects that describe the entity's state with + respect to transparent bridging. If transparent bridging is not + supported this group will not be implemented. This group is + applicable to transparent only and SRT bridges. + +4.1.5. The dot1dStatic Group + + This group contains objects that describe the entity's state with + respect to destination-address filtering. If destination-address + filtering is not supported this group will not be implemented. This + group is applicable to any type of bridge which performs + destination-address filtering. + +4.2. Relationship to Other MIBs + + As described above, some IEEE 802.1d management objects have not been + included in this MIB because they overlap with objects in other MIBs + applicable to a bridge implementing this MIB. In particular, it is + assumed that a bridge implementing this MIB will also implement (at + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 7] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + least) the 'system' group and the 'interfaces' group defined in MIB- + II [6]. + +4.2.1. Relationship to the 'system' group + + In MIB-II, the 'system' group is defined as being mandatory for all + systems such that each managed entity contains one instance of each + object in the 'system' group. Thus, those objects apply to the + entity as a whole irrespective of whether the entity's sole + functionality is bridging, or whether bridging is only a subset of + the entity's functionality. + +4.2.2. Relationship to the 'interfaces' group + + In MIB-II, the 'interfaces' group is defined as being mandatory for + all systems and contains information on an entity's interfaces, where + each interface is thought of as being attached to a `subnetwork'. + (Note that this term is not to be confused with `subnet' which refers + to an addressing partitioning scheme used in the Internet suite of + protocols.) The term 'segment' is used in this memo to refer to such + a subnetwork, whether it be an Ethernet segment, a 'ring', a WAN + link, or even an X.25 virtual circuit. + + Implicit in this Bridge MIB is the notion of ports on a bridge. Each + of these ports is associated with one interface of the 'interfaces' + group, and in most situations, each port is associated with a + different interface. However, there are situations in which multiple + ports are associated with the same interface. An example of such a + situation would be several ports each corresponding one-to-one with + several X.25 virtual circuits but all on the same interface. + + Each port is uniquely identified by a port number. A port number has + no mandatory relationship to an interface number, but in the simple + case a port number will have the same value as the corresponding + interface's interface number. Port numbers are in the range + (1..dot1dBaseNumPorts). + + Some entities perform other functionality as well as bridging through + the sending and receiving of data on their interfaces. In such + situations, only a subset of the data sent/received on an interface + is within the domain of the entity's bridging functionality. This + subset is considered to be delineated according to a set of + protocols, with some protocols being bridged, and other protocols not + being bridged. For example, in an entity which exclusively performed + bridging, all protocols would be considered as being bridged, whereas + in an entity which performed IP routing on IP datagrams and only + bridged other protocols, only the non-IP data would be considered as + being bridged. + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 8] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + Thus, this Bridge MIB (and in particular, its counters) are + applicable only to that subset of the data on an entity's interfaces + which is sent/received for a protocol being bridged. All such data + is sent/received via the ports of the bridge. + +4.3. Textual Conventions + + The datatypes, MacAddress, BridgeId and Timeout, are used as textual + conventions in this document. These textual conventions have NO + effect on either the syntax nor the semantics of any managed object. + Objects defined using these conventions are always encoded by means + of the rules that define their primitive type. Hence, no changes to + the SMI or the SNMP are necessary to accommodate these textual + conventions which are adopted merely for the convenience of readers. + +5. Definitions + + RFC1286-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN + + IMPORTS + Counter, Gauge, TimeTicks + FROM RFC1155-SMI + mib-2 + FROM RFC1213-MIB + OBJECT-TYPE + FROM RFC-1212 + TRAP-TYPE + FROM RFC-1215; + + -- All representations of MAC addresses in this MIB Module use, + -- as a textual convention (i.e. this convention does not affect + -- their encoding), the data type: + + MacAddress ::= OCTET STRING (SIZE (6)) -- a 6 octet address in + -- the "canonical" order + -- defined by IEEE 802.1a, i.e., as if it were transmitted least + -- significant bit first, even though 802.5 (in contrast to other + -- 802.x protocols) requires MAC addresses to be transmitted most + -- significant bit first. + -- + -- 16-bit addresses, if needed, are represented by setting their + -- upper 4 octets to all 0's, i.e., AAFF would be represented + -- as 00000000AAFF. + + + -- Similarly, all representations of Bridge-Id in this MIB Module + -- use, as a textual convention (i.e. this convention does not affect + -- their encoding), the data type: + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 9] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + BridgeId ::= OCTET STRING (SIZE (8)) -- the Bridge-Identifier as + -- used in the Spanning Tree + -- Protocol to uniquely identify a bridge. Its first two octets + -- (in network byte order) contain a priority value and its last + -- 6 octets contain the MAC address used to refer to a bridge in a + -- unique fashion (typically, the numerically smallest MAC address + -- of all ports on the bridge). + -- Several objects in this MIB module represent values of timers + -- used by the Spanning Tree Protocol. In this MIB, these timers + -- have values in units of hundreths of a second (i.e. 1/100 secs). + -- These timers, when stored in a Spanning Tree Protocol's BPDU, + -- are in units of 1/256 seconds. Note, however, that 802.1d/D9 + -- specifies a settable granularity of no more than 1 second for + -- these timers. To avoid ambiguity, a data type is defined here + -- as a textual convention and all representation of these timers + -- in this MIB module are defined using this data type. An algorithm + -- is also defined for converting between the different units, to + -- ensure a timer's value is not distorted by multiple conversions. + -- The data type is: + + Timeout ::= INTEGER -- a STP timer in units of 1/100 seconds + + -- To convert a Timeout value into a value in units of + -- 1/256 seconds, the following algorithm should be used: + -- + -- b = floor( (n * 256) / 100) + -- + -- where: + -- floor = quotient [ignore remainder] + -- n is the value in 1/100 second units + -- b is the value in 1/256 second units + -- + -- To convert the value from 1/256 second units back to + -- 1/100 seconds, the following algorithm should be used: + -- + -- n = ceiling( (b * 100) / 256) + -- + -- where: + -- ceiling = quotient [if remainder is 0], or + -- quotient + 1 [if remainder is non-zero] + -- n is the value in 1/100 second units + -- b is the value in 1/256 second units + -- + -- Note: it is important that the arithmetic operations are done + -- in the order specified (i.e., multiply first, divide second). + + dot1dBridge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mib-2 17 } + + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 10] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + -- groups in the Bridge MIB + + dot1dBase OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dot1dBridge 1 } + + dot1dStp OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dot1dBridge 2 } + + dot1dSr OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dot1dBridge 3 } + + dot1dTp OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dot1dBridge 4 } + + dot1dStatic OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dot1dBridge 5 } + + + -- the dot1dBase group + + -- Implementation of the dot1dBase group is mandatory for all + -- bridges. + + dot1dBaseBridgeAddress OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX MacAddress + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The MAC address used by this bridge when it must + be referred to in a unique fashion. It is + recommended that this be the numerically smallest + MAC address of all ports that belong to this + bridge. However it is only required to be unique. + When concatenated with dot1dStpPriority a unique + BridgeIdentifier is formed which is used in the + Spanning Tree Protocol." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Sections 6.4.1.1.3 and 3.12.5" + ::= { dot1dBase 1 } + + dot1dBaseNumPorts OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of ports controlled by this bridging + entity." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.4.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dBase 2 } + + dot1dBaseType OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 11] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + unknown(1), + transparent-only(2), + sourceroute-only(3), + srt(4) + } + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "Indicates what type of bridging this bridge can + perform. If a bridge is actually performing a + certain type of bridging this will be indicated by + entries in the port table for the given type." + ::= { dot1dBase 3 } + + -- The Generic Bridge Port Table + + dot1dBasePortTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dBasePortEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A table that contains generic information about + every port that is associated with this bridge. + Transparent, source-route, and srt ports are + included." + ::= { dot1dBase 4 } + + dot1dBasePortEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Dot1dBasePortEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A list of information for each port of the + bridge." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.4.2, 6.6.1" + INDEX { dot1dBasePort } + ::= { dot1dBasePortTable 1 } + + Dot1dBasePortEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + dot1dBasePort + INTEGER, + dot1dBasePortIfIndex + INTEGER, + dot1dBasePortCircuit + OBJECT IDENTIFIER, + dot1dBasePortDelayExceededDiscards + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 12] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + Counter, + dot1dBasePortMtuExceededDiscards + Counter + } + + dot1dBasePort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The port number of the port for which this entry + contains bridge management information." + ::= { dot1dBasePortEntry 1 } + + dot1dBasePortIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The value of the instance of the ifIndex object, + defined in [4,6], for the interface corresponding + to this port." + ::= { dot1dBasePortEntry 2 } + + dot1dBasePortCircuit OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "For a port which (potentially) has the same value + of dot1dBasePortIfIndex as another port on the + same bridge, this object contains the name of an + object instance unique to this port. For example, + in the case where multiple ports correspond one- + to-one with multiple X.25 virtual circuits, this + value might identify an (e.g., the first) object + instance associated with the X.25 virtual circuit + corresponding to this port. + + For a port which has a unique value of + dot1dBasePortIfIndex, this object can have the + value { 0 0 }." + ::= { dot1dBasePortEntry 3 } + + dot1dBasePortDelayExceededDiscards OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 13] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames discarded by this port due + to excessive transit delay through the bridge. It + is incremented by both transparent and source + route bridges." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.6.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dBasePortEntry 4 } + + dot1dBasePortMtuExceededDiscards OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames discarded by this port due + to an excessive size. It is incremented by both + transparent and source route bridges." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.6.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dBasePortEntry 5 } + + + -- the dot1dStp group + + -- Implementation of the dot1dStp group is optional. It is + -- implemented by those bridges that support the Spanning Tree + -- Protocol. Transparent, Source Route, and SRT bridges will + -- implement this group only if they support the Spanning Tree + -- Protocol. + + + dot1dStpProtocolSpecification OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + unknown(1), + decLb100(2), + ieee8021d(3) + } + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "An indication of what version of the Spanning + Tree Protocol is being run. The value + 'decLb100(2)' indicates the DEC LANbridge 100 + Spanning Tree protocol. IEEE 802.1d + implementations will return 'ieee8021d(3)'. If + future versions of the IEEE Spanning Tree Protocol + are released that are incompatible with the + current version a new value will be defined." + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 14] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + ::= { dot1dStp 1 } + + dot1dStpPriority OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER (0..65535) + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The value of the write-able portion of the Bridge + ID, i.e., the first two octets of the (8 octet + long) Bridge ID. The other (last) 6 octets of the + Bridge ID are given by the value of + dot1dBaseBridgeAddress." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.7" + ::= { dot1dStp 2 } + + dot1dStpTimeSinceTopologyChange OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeTicks + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The time (in hundredths of a second) since the + last time a topology change was detected by the + bridge entity." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.8.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dStp 3 } + + dot1dStpTopChanges OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of topology changes detected by + this bridge since the management entity was last + reset or initialized." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.8.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dStp 4 } + + dot1dStpDesignatedRoot OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX BridgeId + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The bridge identifier of the root of the spanning + tree as determined by the Spanning Tree Protocol + as executed by this node. This value is used as + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 15] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + the Root Identifier parameter in all Configuration + Bridge PDUs originated by this node." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.1" + ::= { dot1dStp 5 } + + dot1dStpRootCost OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The cost of the path to the root as seen from + this bridge." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.2" + ::= { dot1dStp 6 } + + dot1dStpRootPort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The port number of the port which offers the + lowest cost path from this bridge to the root + bridge." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.3" + ::= { dot1dStp 7 } + + dot1dStpMaxAge OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Timeout + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The maximum age of Spanning Tree Protocol + information learned from the network on any port + before it is discarded, in units of hundredths of + a second. This is the actual value that this + bridge is currently using." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.4" + ::= { dot1dStp 8 } + + dot1dStpHelloTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Timeout + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 16] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + "The amount of time between the transmission of + Configuration bridge PDUs by this node on any port + when it is the root of the spanning tree or trying + to become so, in units of hundredths of a second. + This is the actual value that this bridge is + currently using." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.5" + ::= { dot1dStp 9 } + + dot1dStpHoldTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "This time value determines the interval length + during which no more than two Configuration bridge + PDUs shall be transmitted by this node, in units + of hundredths of a second." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.14" + ::= { dot1dStp 10 } + + dot1dStpForwardDelay OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Timeout + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "This time value, measured in units of hundredths + of a second, controls how fast a port changes its + spanning state when moving towards the Forwarding + state. The value determines how long the port + stays in a particular state before moving to the + next state. For example, how long a port stays in + the Listening state when moving from Blocking to + Learning. This value is also used, when a + topology change has been detected and is underway, + to age all dynamic entries in the Forwarding + Database. [Note that this value is the one that + this bridge is currently using, in contrast to + dot1dStpBridgeForwardDelay which is the value that + this bridge and all others would start using + if/when this bridge were to become the root.]" + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.6" + ::= { dot1dStp 11 } + + + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 17] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + dot1dStpBridgeMaxAge OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Timeout (600..4000) + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The value that all bridges use for MaxAge when + this bridge is acting as the root. Note that + 802.1d/D9 specifies that the range for this + parameter is related to the value of + dot1dStpBridgeHelloTime. The granularity of this + timer is specified by 802.1d/D9 to be 1 second. + An agent may return a badValue error if a set is + attempted to a value which is not a whole number + of seconds." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.8" + ::= { dot1dStp 12 } + + dot1dStpBridgeHelloTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Timeout (100..1000) + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The value that all bridges use for HelloTime when + this bridge is acting as the root. The + granularity of this timer is specified by + 802.1d/D9 to be 1 second. An agent may return a + badValue error if a set is attempted to a value + which is not a whole number of seconds." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.9" + ::= { dot1dStp 13 } + + dot1dStpBridgeForwardDelay OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Timeout (400..3000) + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The value that all bridges use for ForwardDelay + when this bridge is acting as the root. Note that + 802.1d/D9 specifies that the range for this + parameter is related to the value of + dot1dStpBridgeMaxAge. The granularity of this + timer is specified by 802.1d/D9 to be 1 second. + An agent may return a badValue error if a set is + attempted to a value which is not a whole number + of seconds." + REFERENCE + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 18] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.3.10" + ::= { dot1dStp 14 } + + + -- The Spanning Tree Port Table + + dot1dStpPortTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dStpPortEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A table that contains port-specific information + for the Spanning Tree Protocol." + ::= { dot1dStp 15 } + + dot1dStpPortEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Dot1dStpPortEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A list of information maintained by every port + about the Spanning Tree Protocol state for that + port." + INDEX { dot1dStpPort } + ::= { dot1dStpPortTable 1 } + + Dot1dStpPortEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + dot1dStpPort + INTEGER, + dot1dStpPortPriority + INTEGER, + dot1dStpPortState + INTEGER, + dot1dStpPortEnable + INTEGER, + dot1dStpPortPathCost + INTEGER, + dot1dStpPortDesignatedRoot + BridgeId, + dot1dStpPortDesignatedCost + INTEGER, + dot1dStpPortDesignatedBridge + BridgeId, + dot1dStpPortDesignatedPort + OCTET STRING, + dot1dStpPortForwardTransitions + Counter + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 19] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + } + + dot1dStpPort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The port number of the port for which this entry + contains Spanning Tree Protocol management + information." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.8.2.1.2" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 1 } + + dot1dStpPortPriority OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER (0..255) + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The value of the priority field which is + contained in the first (in network byte order) + octet of the (2 octet long) Port ID. The other + octet of the Port ID is given by the value of + dot1dStpPort." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.5.1" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 2 } + + dot1dStpPortState OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + disabled(1), + blocking(2), + listening(3), + learning(4), + forwarding(5), + broken(6) + } + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The port's current state as defined by + application of the Spanning Tree Protocol. This + state controls what action a port takes on + reception of a frame. If the bridge has detected + a port that is malfunctioning it will place that + port into the broken(6) state. For ports which + are disabled (see dot1dStpPortEnable), this object + will have a value of disabled(1)." + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 20] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.5.2" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 3 } + + dot1dStpPortEnable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + enabled(1), + disabled(2) + } + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The enabled/disabled status of the port." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.5.2" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 4 } + + dot1dStpPortPathCost OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER (1..65535) + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The contribution of this port to the path cost of + paths towards the spanning tree root which include + this port." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.5.3" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 5 } + + dot1dStpPortDesignatedRoot OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX BridgeId + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The unique Bridge Identifier of the Bridge + recorded as the Root in the Configuration BPDUs + transmitted by the Designated Bridge for the + segment to which the port is attached." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.5.4" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 6 } + + dot1dStpPortDesignatedCost OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The path cost of the Designated Port of the + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 21] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + segment connected to this port. This value is + compared to the Root Path Cost field in received + bridge PDUs." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.5.5" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 7 } + + dot1dStpPortDesignatedBridge OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX BridgeId + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The Bridge Identifier of the bridge which this + port considers to be the Designated Bridge for + this port's segment." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.5.6" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 8 } + + dot1dStpPortDesignatedPort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (2)) + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The Port Identifier of the port on the Designated + Bridge for this port's segment." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 4.5.5.7" + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 9 } + + dot1dStpPortForwardTransitions OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of times this port has transitioned + from the Learning state to the Forwarding state." + ::= { dot1dStpPortEntry 10 } + + + -- the dot1dSr group + + -- Implementation of the dot1dSr group is optional. It is + -- implemented by those bridges that support the source route + -- bridging mode, including Source Route and SRT bridges. + + + + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 22] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + dot1dSrPortTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dSrPortEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A table that contains information about every + port that is associated with this source route + bridge." + ::= { dot1dSr 1 } + + dot1dSrPortEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Dot1dSrPortEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A list of information for each port of a source + route bridge." + INDEX { dot1dSrPort } + ::= { dot1dSrPortTable 1 } + + Dot1dSrPortEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + dot1dSrPort + INTEGER, + dot1dSrPortHopCount + INTEGER, + dot1dSrPortLocalSegment + INTEGER, + dot1dSrPortBridgeNum + INTEGER, + dot1dSrPortTargetSegment + INTEGER, + dot1dSrPortLargestFrame + INTEGER, + dot1dSrPortSTESpanMode + INTEGER, + dot1dSrPortSpecInFrames + Counter, + dot1dSrPortSpecOutFrames + Counter, + dot1dSrPortApeInFrames + Counter, + dot1dSrPortApeOutFrames + Counter, + dot1dSrPortSteInFrames + Counter, + dot1dSrPortSteOutFrames + Counter, + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 23] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + dot1dSrPortSegmentMismatchDiscards + Counter, + dot1dSrPortDuplicateSegmentDiscards + Counter, + dot1dSrPortHopCountExceededDiscards + Counter + } + + dot1dSrPort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The port number of the port for which this entry + contains Source Route management information." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 1 } + + dot1dSrPortHopCount OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The maximum number of routing descriptors allowed + in an All Paths or Spanning Tree Explorer frames." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 2 } + + dot1dSrPortLocalSegment OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The segment number that uniquely identifies the + segment to which this port is connected. Current + source routing protocols limit this value to the + range: 0 through 4095. A value of 65535 signifies + that no segment number is assigned to this port." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 3 } + + dot1dSrPortBridgeNum OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A bridge number uniquely identifies a bridge when + more than one bridge is used to span the same two + segments. Current source routing protocols limit + this value to the range: 0 through 15. A value of + 65535 signifies that no bridge number is assigned + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 24] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + to this bridge." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 4 } + + dot1dSrPortTargetSegment OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The segment number that corresponds to the target + segment this port is considered to be connected to + by the bridge. Current source routing protocols + limit this value to the range: 0 through 4095. A + value of 65535 signifies that no target segment is + assigned to this port." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 5 } + + -- It would be nice if we could use ifMtu as the size of the + -- largest frame, but we can't because ifMtu is defined to be + -- the size that the (inter-)network layer can use which can + -- differ from the MAC layer (especially if several layers of + -- encapsulation are used). + + dot1dSrPortLargestFrame OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + dot1dSrMtu516 (516), + dot1dSrMtu1500 (1500), + dot1dSrMtu2052 (2052), + dot1dSrMtu4472 (4472), + dot1dSrMtu8144 (8144), + dot1dSrMtu11407 (11407), -- yes this is correct don't + dot1dSrMtu17800 (17800), -- ask me where it came from. + dot1dSrMtu65535 (65535) + } + + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The maximum size of the INFO field (LLC and + above) that this port can send/receive. It does + not include any MAC level (framing) octets. The + value of this object is used by this bridge to + determine whether a modification of the + LargestFrame (LF, see [14]) field of the Routing + Control field of the Routing Information Field is + necessary. Valid values as defined by the 802.5 + source routing bridging specification[14] are 516, + 1500, 2052, 4472, 8144, 11407, 17800, and 65535 + octets. Behavior of the port when an illegal + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 25] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + value is written is implementation specific. It + is recommended that a reasonable legal value be + chosen." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 6 } + + dot1dSrPortSTESpanMode OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + auto-span(1), + disabled(2), + forced(3) + } + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "Determines how this port behaves when presented + with a Spanning Tree Explorer frame. The value + 'disabled(2)' indicates that the port will not + accept or send Spanning Tree Explorer packets; any + STE packets received will be silently discarded. + The value 'forced(3)' indicates the port will + always accept and propagate Spanning Tree Explorer + frames. This allows a manually configured + Spanning Tree for this class of packet to be + configured. Note that unlike transparent bridging + this is not catastrophic to the network if there + are loops. The value 'auto-span(1)' can only be + returned by a bridge that both implements the + Spanning Tree Protocol and has use of the protocol + enabled on this port. The behavior of the port for + Spanning Tree Explorer frames is determined by the + state of dot1dStpPortState. If the port is in the + 'forwarding' state, the frame will be accepted or + propagated. Otherwise it will be silently + discarded." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 7 } + + dot1dSrPortSpecInFrames OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of specifically routed frames that + have been received from this port's segment." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 8 } + + dot1dSrPortSpecOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 26] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of specifically routed frames that + this port has transmitted on its segment." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 9 } + + dot1dSrPortApeInFrames OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of all paths explorer frames that have + been received by this port from its segment." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 10 } + + dot1dSrPortApeOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of all paths explorer frames that have + been transmitted by this port on its segment." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 11 } + + dot1dSrPortSteInFrames OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of spanning tree explorer frames that + have been received by this port from its segment." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 12 } + + dot1dSrPortSteOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of spanning tree explorer frames that + have been transmitted by this port on its + segment." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 13 } + + dot1dSrPortSegmentMismatchDiscards OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 27] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + "The number of explorer frames that have been + discarded by this port because the routing + descriptor field contained an invalid adjacent + segment value." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 14 } + + dot1dSrPortDuplicateSegmentDiscards OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that have been discarded by + this port because the routing descriptor field + contained a duplicate segment identifier." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 15 } + + dot1dSrPortHopCountExceededDiscards OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of explorer frames that have been + discarded by this port because the Routing + Information Field has exceeded the maximum route + descriptor length." + ::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 16 } + + + -- the dot1dTp group + + -- Implementation of the dot1dTp group is optional. It is + -- implemented by those bridges that support the transparent + -- bridging mode. A transparent or SRT bridge will implement + -- this group. + + + dot1dTpLearnedEntryDiscards OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of Forwarding Database entries, + which have been or would have been learnt, but + have been discarded due to a lack of space to + store them in the Forwarding Database. If this + counter is increasing, it indicates that the + Forwarding Database is regularly becoming full (a + condition which has unpleasant performance effects + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 28] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + on the subnetwork). If this counter has a + significant value but is not presently increasing, + it indicates that the problem has been occurring + but is not persistent." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.7.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dTp 1 } + + dot1dTpAgingTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The timeout period in seconds for aging out + dynamically learned forwarding information." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.7.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dTp 2 } + + + -- The Forwarding Database for Transparent Bridges + + dot1dTpFdbTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dTpFdbEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A table that contains information about unicast + entries for which the bridge has forwarding and/or + filtering information. This information is used + by the transparent bridging function in + determining how to propagate a received frame." + ::= { dot1dTp 3 } + + dot1dTpFdbEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Dot1dTpFdbEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "Information about a specific unicast MAC address + for which the bridge has some forwarding and/or + filtering information." + INDEX { dot1dTpFdbAddress } + ::= { dot1dTpFdbTable 1 } + + Dot1dTpFdbEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + dot1dTpFdbAddress + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 29] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + MacAddress, + dot1dTpFdbPort + INTEGER, + dot1dTpFdbStatus + INTEGER + } + + dot1dTpFdbAddress OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX MacAddress + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A unicast MAC address for which the bridge has + forwarding and/or filtering information." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 3.9.1, 3.9.2" + ::= { dot1dTpFdbEntry 1 } + + dot1dTpFdbPort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "Either the value '0', or the port number of the + port on which a frame having a source address + equal to the value of the corresponding instance + of dot1dTpFdbAddress has been seen. A value of + '0' indicates that the port number has not been + learned but that the bridge does have some + forwarding/filtering information about this + address (e.g. in the dot1dStaticTable). + Implementors are encouraged to assign the port + value to this object whenever it is learned even + for addresses for which the corresponding value of + dot1dTpFdbStatus is not learned(3)." + + ::= { dot1dTpFdbEntry 2 } + + dot1dTpFdbStatus OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + other(1), + invalid(2), + learned(3), + self(4), + mgmt(5) + } + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 30] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + DESCRIPTION + "The status of this entry. The meanings of the + values are: + + other(1) : none of the following. This would + include the case where some other + MIB object (not the corresponding + instance of dot1dTpFdbPort, nor an + entry in the dot1dStaticTable) is + being used to determine if and how + frames addressed to the value of + the corresponding instance of + dot1dTpFdbAddress are being + forwarded. + + invalid(2) : this entry is not longer valid + (e.g., it was learned but has since + aged-out), but has not yet been + flushed from the table. + + learned(3) : the value of the corresponding + instance of dot1dTpFdbPort was + learned, and is being used. + + self(4) : the value of the corresponding + instance of dot1dTpFdbAddress + represents one of the bridge's + addresses. The corresponding + instance of dot1dTpFdbPort + indicates which of the bridge's + ports has this address. + + mgmt(5) : the value of the corresponding + instance of dot1dTpFdbAddress is + also the value of an existing + instance of dot1dStaticAddress." + ::= { dot1dTpFdbEntry 3 } + + + -- Port Table for Transparent Bridges + + dot1dTpPortTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dTpPortEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A table that contains information about every + port that is associated with this transparent + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 31] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + bridge." + ::= { dot1dTp 4 } + + dot1dTpPortEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Dot1dTpPortEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A list of information for each port of a + transparent bridge." + INDEX { dot1dTpPort } + ::= { dot1dTpPortTable 1 } + + Dot1dTpPortEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + dot1dTpPort + INTEGER, + dot1dTpPortMaxInfo + INTEGER, + dot1dTpPortInFrames + Counter, + dot1dTpPortOutFrames + Counter, + dot1dTpPortInDiscards + Counter + } + + dot1dTpPort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The port number of the port for which this entry + contains Transparent bridging management + information." + ::= { dot1dTpPortEntry 1 } + + -- It would be nice if we could use ifMtu as the size of the + -- largest INFO field, but we can't because ifMtu is defined + -- to be the size that the (inter-)network layer can use which + -- can differ from the MAC layer (especially if several layers + -- of encapsulation are used). + + dot1dTpPortMaxInfo OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 32] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + "The maximum size of the INFO (non-MAC) field that + this port will receive or transmit." + ::= { dot1dTpPortEntry 2 } + + dot1dTpPortInFrames OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that have been received by + this port from its segment. Note that a frame + received on the interface corresponding to this + port is only counted by this object if and only if + it is for a protocol being processed by the local + bridging function." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.6.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dTpPortEntry 3 } + + dot1dTpPortOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that have been transmitted + by this port to its segment. Note that a frame + transmitted on the interface corresponding to this + port is only counted by this object if and only if + it is for a protocol being processed by the local + bridging function." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.6.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dTpPortEntry 4 } + + dot1dTpPortInDiscards OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter + ACCESS read-only + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "Count of valid frames received which were + discarded (i.e., filtered) by the Forwarding + Process." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.6.1.1.3" + ::= { dot1dTpPortEntry 5 } + + + + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 33] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + -- The Static (Destination-Address Filtering) Database + + -- Implementation of this group is optional. + + + dot1dStaticTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dStaticEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "A table containing filtering information + configured into the bridge by (local or network) + management specifying the set of ports to which + frames received from specific ports and containing + specific destination addresses are allowed to be + forwarded. The value of zero in this table as the + port number from which frames with a specific + destination address are received, is used to + specify all ports for which there is no specific + entry in this table for that particular + destination address. Entries are valid for + unicast and for group/broadcast addresses." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 6.7.2" + ::= { dot1dStatic 1 } + + dot1dStaticEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Dot1dStaticEntry + ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "Filtering information configured into the bridge + by (local or network) management specifying the + set of ports to which frames received from a + specific port and containing a specific + destination address are allowed to be forwarded." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14,1989: Section 6.7.2" + INDEX { dot1dStaticAddress, dot1dStaticReceivePort } + ::= { dot1dStaticTable 1 } + + Dot1dStaticEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + dot1dStaticAddress + MacAddress, + dot1dStaticReceivePort + INTEGER, + dot1dStaticAllowedToGoTo + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 34] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + OCTET STRING, + dot1dStaticStatus + INTEGER + } + + dot1dStaticAddress OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX MacAddress + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The destination MAC address in a frame to which + this entry's filtering information applies. This + object can take the value of a unicast address, a + group address or the broadcast address." + REFERENCE + "P802.1d/D9, July 14, 1989: Section 3.9.1, 3.9.2" + ::= { dot1dStaticEntry 1 } + + dot1dStaticReceivePort OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "Either the value '0', or the port number of the + port from which a frame must be received in order + for this entry's filtering information to apply. + A value of zero indicates that this entry applies + on all ports of the bridge for which there is no + other applicable entry." + ::= { dot1dStaticEntry 2 } + + dot1dStaticAllowedToGoTo OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX OCTET STRING + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "The set of ports to which frames received from a + specific port and destined for a specific MAC + address, are allowed to be forwarded. Each octet + within the value of this object specifies a set of + eight ports, with the first octet specifying ports + 1 through 8, the second octet specifying ports 9 + through 16, etc. Within each octet, the most + significant bit represents the lowest numbered + port, and the least significant bit represents the + highest numbered port. Thus, each port of the + bridge is represented by a single bit within the + value of this object. If that bit has a value of + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 35] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + '1' then that port is included in the set of + ports; the port is not included if its bit has a + value of '0'. (Note that the setting of the bit + corresponding to the port from which a frame is + received is irrelevant.)" + ::= { dot1dStaticEntry 3 } + + dot1dStaticStatus OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + other(1), + invalid(2), + permanent(3), + deleteOnReset(4), + deleteOnTimeout(5) + } + ACCESS read-write + STATUS mandatory + DESCRIPTION + "This object indicates the status of this entry. + other(1) - this entry is currently in use but + the conditions under which it will + remain so are different from each of the + following values. + invalid(2) - writing this value to the object + removes the corresponding entry. + permanent(3) - this entry is currently in use + and will remain so after the next reset + of the bridge. + deleteOnReset(4) - this entry is currently in + use and will remain so until the next + reset of the bridge. + deleteOnTimeout(5) - this entry is currently + in use and will remain so until it is + aged out." + ::= { dot1dStaticEntry 4 } + + -- Traps for use by Bridges + + -- Traps for the Spanning Tree Protocol + + newRoot TRAP-TYPE + ENTERPRISE dot1dBridge + DESCRIPTION + "The newRoot trap indicates that the sending agent + has become the new root of the Spanning Tree; the + trap is sent by a bridge soon after its election + as the new root, e.g., upon expiration of the + Topology Change Timer immediately subsequent to + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 36] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + its election." + ::= 1 + + topologyChange TRAP-TYPE + ENTERPRISE dot1dBridge + DESCRIPTION + "A topologyChange trap is sent by a bridge when + any of its configured ports transitions from the + Learning state to the Forwarding state, or from + the Forwarding state to the Blocking state. The + trap is not sent if a newRoot trap is sent for the + same transition." + ::= 2 + + END + +6. Acknowledgments + + This document was produced on behalf of the Bridge Sub-Working Group + of the SNMP Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force. + Over the course of its deliberations, the working group received four + separate documents for consideration as the basis for its work. The + first was submitted by Stan Froyd of Advanced Computer + Communications; the second by Richard Fox of SynOptics; the third by + Eric Decker of cisco Inc. and Keith McCloghrie of Hughes LAN Systems; + and the fourth by Paul Langille and Anil Rijsinghani of Digital + Equipment Corp. After considering the submissions, the working group + chose to proceed with a document formed as a conjunction of the + latter two submissions. This document is the result. + + The authors wish to thank the members of the Bridge Working Group for + their many comments and suggestions which improved this effort. In + particular, Fred Baker (chairman of the working group) of ACC, Steve + Sherry of Xyplex, and Frank Kastenholz of Clearpoint Research Corp. + Others members of the Bridge Working Group who contributed to this + effort are: + + Bill Anderson, Mitre + Karl Auerbach, Epilogue + Fred Baker, ACC (chair) + Terry Bradley, Wellfleet + Ted Brunner, Bellcore + Jeffrey Buffum, Apollo + Chris ChioTasso, Fibronics + Anthony Chung, HLS + Chuck Davin, MIT-LCS + Andy Davis, Spider + Eric Decker, cisco + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 37] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + Nadya El-Afandi, Network Systems + Gary Ellis,HP/Apollo + Richard Fox, SynOptics + Stan Froyd, ACC + Frank Kastenholz, Clearpoint Research + Shirnshon Kaufman, + Jim Kinder, Fibercom + Cheryl Krupczak,NCR + Paul Langille, Digital + Peter Lin,Vitalink + Keith McCloghrie, HLS + Donna McMaster, SynOptics + Dave Perkins, 3Com + Jim Reinstedler, Ungermann Bass + Anil Rijsinghani, Digital + Mark Schaefer, David Systems + Steve Sherry, Xyplex + Bob Stewart, Xyplex + Emil Sturniolo, + Kevin Synott, Retix + Ian Thomas, Chipcom + Maurice Turcott, Racal + Fei Xu, + +7. References + + [1] Cerf, V., "IAB Recommendations for the Development of Internet + Network Management Standards", RFC 1052, NRI, April 1988. + + [2] Cerf, V., "Report of the Second Ad Hoc Network Management Review + Group", RFC 1109, NRI, August 1989. + + [3] Rose M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of + Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets", RFC 1155, + Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, May 1990. + + [4] McCloghrie K., and M. Rose, "Management Information Base for + Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", RFC 1156, Hughes + LAN Systems, Performance Systems International, May 1990. + + [5] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple + Network Management Protocol", RFC 1157, SNMP Research, + Performance Systems International, Performance Systems + International, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, May 1990. + + [6] McCloghrie K., and M. Rose, Editors, "Management Information Base + for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", RFC 1213, + Performance Systems International, March 1991. + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 38] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + + [7] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - + Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), + International Organization for Standardization, International + Standard 8824, December 1987. + + [8] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - + Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Notation One + (ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization, + International Standard 8825, December 1987. + + [9] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, Editors, "Concise MIB Definitions", + RFC 1212, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, + March 1991. + + [10] Rose, M., Editor, "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with + the SNMP", RFC 1215, Performance Systems International, March + 1991. + + [11] ANSI/IEEE Draft P802.1d/D9 MAC Bridges, "IEEE Project 802 Local + and Metropolitan Area Networks", July 14, 1989. + + [12] I.B.M. Token Ring Architecture Reference. + + [13] ISO DIS 10038 MAC Bridges. + + [14] ANSI/IEEE P802.1x/P802.5x, "Proposed Draft Local Area Network + Standard -- MAC Bridges, Source Routing Supplement", IEEE Project + 802, September 1990. + + [15] ANSI/IEEE 802.1y, "Source Routing Tutorial for End System + Operation", September 1990. + +8. Security Considerations + + Security issues are not discussed in this memo. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 39] + +RFC 1286 Bridge MIB December 1991 + + +9. Authors' Addresses + + Eric B. Decker + cisco Systems, Inc. + 1525 O'Brien Dr. + Menlo Park, CA 94025 + + Phone: (415) 326-1941 + Email: cire@cisco.com + + + Paul Langille + Digital Equipment Corporation + Digital Drive, MK02-2/K03 + Merrimack, NH 03054 + + Phone: (603) 884-4045 + EMail: langille@edwin.enet.dec.com + + + Anil Rijsinghani + Digital Equipment Corporation + 153 Taylor St. + Littleton, MA 01460 + + Phone: (508)952-3520 + EMail: anil@levers.enet.dec.com + + + Keith McCloghrie + Hughes LAN Systems + 1225 Charleston Road + Mountain View, CA 94043 + + Phone: (415) 966-7934 + EMail: kzm@hls.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Decker, Langille, Rijsinghani & McCloghrie [Page 40] +
\ No newline at end of file |