doc: Add RFC documents

1 files changed, 114 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc701.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc701.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7a7d401
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc701.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+					AUGUST, 1974
+
+	AUGUST, 1974, SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS
+
+THIS IS THE FIRST OF WHAT ARE PLANNED TO BE MONTHLY REPORTS ON
+THE STATUS OF THE NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET IMPLEMENTAIONS ON THE SERVER
+HOSTS ON THE ARPA NETWORK.  INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT ARE DATA ONLY
+ON SERVER TELNETS AT THE VARIOUS SITES.  ONE WOULD HOPE THAT ANY
+SITE WITH AN OPERATIONAL NEW-PROTOCOL SERVER TELNET WOULD ALSO BOAST
+A NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET; WE CAN CERTAINLY ASSUME THIS FOR TENEX
+SITES AT WHICH TENEX 1.32 IS OPERATING.  HOWEVER, NO FURTHER CLAIMS
+ARE MADE FOR THE SERVER DATA CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT.
+
+I AM SORRY TO REPORT THAT AT THIS LATE DATE, A MONTH AFTER THE RELEASE
+OF TENEX 1.32, LESS THAN ONE-THIRD OF THE SERVER SITES HAVE ANY NEW-
+PROTOCOL SERVER OPERATING, ACCORDING TO MY SURVEYS*, AND ONLY HALF
+OF THOSE ARE USING CORRECTLY THE LOGGER SOCKET CONVENTIONS, AS I
+UNDERSTAND THEM.  AT THE END OF THIS REPORT IS A COMPLETE TABULATION
+COMPILED FROM MY SURVEYS;  THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY:
+
+	TOTAL SERVER HOSTS		32	100%
+
+	STATUS UNKNOWN (1)		 3	  9%
+
+	NO NEW-PROT SERVER		19	 59%
+
+	TOTAL NEW-PROT IMPLEM.		10	 31%
+
+	  NEW-PROT ON SOCKET 27,
+	  OLD ON SOCKET 1 (2)		 5	 16%
+
+ 	  NEW-PROT ON 1 AND 27 (3)	 4	 13%
+
+	  NEW-PROT ON 1 ONLY (3)	 1	  3%
+
+
+NOTES:
+
+*  ALL DATA IN THIS REPORT WERE GATHERED VIA A SURVEYING PROGRAM
+   RUN AT VARIOUS TIMES, PLUS A FEW MANUAL CHECKS TO FILL OUT THE
+   DATA.  WHAT IS REPORTED HERE IS THE WAY THE VARIOUS SERVERS WORK
+   AS SEEN BY THE NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET AT BBNA, AS OF 15 AUG.
+   1974.  THERE MAY BE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE RESULTS AND THOSE
+   FROM SURVEYS MADE AT OTHER SITES.
+
+(1) NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS TO CONNECT TO THESE SITES ALL FAILED DUE TO
+   THE SITES' BEING DOWN TO THE NETWORK.
+
+(2) THESE ARE THE SITES WHOSE OPERATION IS 100% CORRECT ACCORDING
+   TO ALL PROTOCOLS AND CONVENTIONS, AS I UNDERSTAND THEM.
+
+(3) WE REALIZE THAT SOME OF THE SERVERS THAT APPEAR HERE AS NEW-
+   PROTOCOL SERVERS ON SOCKET 1 ARE ACTUALLY SERVERS WHICH ATTEMPT
+   TO COMMUNICATE WITH BOTH OLD- AND NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNETS
+   ACCORDING TO WHAT CONTROL SEQUENCES ARE RECEIVED.
+
+
+TABULATION OF SERVER STATUS FOR ALL SERVER SITES:
+
+HOST      HOST          SOCKET  SOCKET    NEW-PROT. OPTIONS
+ NO.      NAME            1       27      IMPLEMENTATED (IF ANY)
+
+  1	UCLA-NMC	?	?	
+101	UCLA-CCN	OLD	X
+201	UCLA-CCBC	OLD	X	
+  2	SRI-ARC		OLD	X
+102	SRI-AI		OLD	X
+  3	UCSB-MOD75	OLD	X
+  4	UTAH-10		OLD	X
+105	BBN-TENEX	OLD	NEW	I1,3,6; 03
+205	BBN-TENEXB	OLD	NEW	I1,3,6; 03
+305	BBN-TENEXA	OLD	NEW	I1,3,6; 03
+106	MIT-DMS		NEW	NEW	I1,3; 03
+206	MIT-AI		OLD	X
+306	MIT-ML		OLD	X
+ 10	SDC-LAB		?	?
+ 11	HARV-10		NEW	X	I1,3; 03
+ 12	LL-67		OLD	X
+112	LL-TX-2		OLD	X
+ 13	SU-AI		NEW*	NEW*	I1,3
+ 15	CASE-10		OLD	X
+ 16	CMU-10B		NEW	NEW	I1,3; 03
+116	CMU-10A		NEW	NEW	I1,3; 03
+ 17	I4-TENEX	OLD	X
+117	I4-TENEXA	?	?
+ 20	AMES-67		OLD	OLD(1)
+126	USC-ISI		OLD	X
+ 27	USC-44		OLD	X
+ 32	SDAC		OLD	X
+ 37	CCA-TENEX	OLD	X
+ 40	PARC-MAXC	OLD	NEW	I1,3,6; 03
+ 43	UCSD-CC		OLD	NEW	IO(1),3; 00,3
+ 53	OFFICE-1	OLD	X
+ 54	MIT-MULTICS	NEW	NEW	NONE
+
+KEY:
+	X	NO SEVER AT THIS SOCKET
+	?	STATUS UNKNOWN
+	I#	OPTION # IMPLEMENTED INCOMING TO USER
+		  (SERVER SAYS "WILL #")
+	O#	OPTION # IMPLEMENTED OUTGOING FROM USER
+		  (SERVER SAYS "DO #")
+		(# IS OPTION NUMBER IN NEW PROTOCOL.  ALL OPTIONS
+		IMPLEMENTED BY ANYONE ARE:
+			0	TRANSMIT-BINARY
+			1	ECHO
+			3	SUPRESS-GO-AHEAD
+			6	TIMING MARK )
+
+NOTE: * THERE APPEARS TO BE A MINOR BUG IN SU-AI'S SERVER: IT SEEMS
+        TO SEND AN IMPROPER RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR OPTION O.
+
+   SUBMITTED 20 AUGUST 1974
+   BY D. W. DODDS
\ No newline at end of file